Combining Supervised and Un-supervised Learning for Automatic Citrus Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Citrus segmentation is a key step of automatic citrus picking. While most current image segmentation approaches achieve good segmentation results by pixel-wise segmentation, these supervised learning-based methods require a large amount of annotated data, and do not consider the continuous temporal changes of citrus position in real-world applications. In this paper, we first train a simple CNN with a small number of labelled citrus images in a supervised manner, which can roughly predict the citrus location from each frame. Then, we extend a state-of-the-art unsupervised learning approach to pre-learn the citrus's potential movements between frames from unlabelled citrus's videos. To take advantages of both networks, we employ the multimodal transformer to combine supervised learned static information and unsupervised learned movement information. The experimental results show that combing both network allows the prediction accuracy reached at 88.3% IOU and 93.6% precision, outperforming the original supervised baseline 1.2% and 2.4%. Compared with most of the existing citrus segmentation methods, our method uses a small amount of supervised data and a large number of unsupervised data, while learning the pixel level location information and the temporal information of citrus changes to enhance the segmentation effect.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2021.
Builds on
14 of 31 references.
References · 14
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
- 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
- 2016Pyramid Scene Parsing Networkcited by 2,472
- 2019Learning Correspondence from the Cycle-Consistency of Timecited by 269
- 2020Space-Time Correspondence as a Contrastive Random Walkcited by 239
- 2019Temporal Cycle-Consistency Learningcited by 151
- 2016Learning Features by Watching Objects Movecited by 138
- 2019SelFlow: Self-Supervised Learning of Optical Flowcited by 128
- 2017Unsupervised Learning of Long-Term Motion Dynamics for Videoscited by 37
Built on by
Not cited yet.