mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Business analytics meets artificial intelligence: Assessing the demand effects of discounts on Swiss train tickets

arXiv 2105.01426 ↗First posted 4 May 2021econ.GN q-fin.EC stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We assess the demand effects of discounts on train tickets issued by the Swiss Federal Railways, the so-called `supersaver tickets', based on machine learning, a subfield of artificial intelligence. Considering a survey-based sample of buyers of supersaver tickets, we investigate which customer- or trip-related characteristics (including the discount rate) predict buying behavior, namely: booking a trip otherwise not realized by train, buying a first- rather than second-class ticket, or rescheduling a trip (e.g. away from rush hours) when being offered a supersaver ticket. Predictive machine learning suggests that customer's age, demand-related information for a specific connection (like departure time and utilization), and the discount level permit forecasting buying behavior to a certain extent. Furthermore, we use causal machine learning to assess the impact of the discount rate on rescheduling a trip, which seems relevant in the light of capacity constraints at rush hours. Assuming that (i) the discount rate is quasi-random conditional on our rich set of characteristics and (ii) the buying decision increases weakly monotonically in the discount rate, we identify the discount rate's effect among `always buyers', who would have traveled even without a discount, based on our survey that asks about customer behavior in the absence of discounts. We find that on average, increasing the discount rate by one percentage point increases the share of rescheduled trips by 0.16 percentage points among always buyers. Investigating effect heterogeneity across observables suggests that the effects are higher for leisure travelers and during peak hours when controlling several other characteristics.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2021.

Builds on

6 of 64 references.

References · 6

  1. 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 600
  2. 2016Generalized Random Forestscited by 312
  3. 2015Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Causal Effectscited by 255
  4. 2015ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and Rcited by 172
  5. 2019Machine Learning Methods Economists Should Know Aboutcited by 64
  6. 2013A Bayesian Approach to Learning Causal Networkscited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.