Impact of Encoding and Segmentation Strategies on End-to-End Simultaneous Speech Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Boosted by the simultaneous translation shared task at IWSLT 2020, promising end-to-end online speech translation approaches were recently proposed. They consist in incrementally encoding a speech input (in a source language) and decoding the corresponding text (in a target language) with the best possible trade-off between latency and translation quality. This paper investigates two key aspects of end-to-end simultaneous speech translation: (a) how to encode efficiently the continuous speech flow, and (b) how to segment the speech flow in order to alternate optimally between reading (R: encoding input) and writing (W: decoding output) operations. We extend our previously proposed end-to-end online decoding strategy and show that while replacing BLSTM by ULSTM encoding degrades performance in offline mode, it actually improves both efficiency and performance in online mode. We also measure the impact of different methods to segment the speech signal (using fixed interval boundaries, oracle word boundaries or randomly set boundaries) and show that our best end-to-end online decoding strategy is surprisingly the one that alternates R/W operations on fixed size blocks on our English-German speech translation setup.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2021.
Builds on
16 of 25 references.
References · 16
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
- 2018How2: A Large-scale Dataset for Multimodal Language Understandingcited by 138
- 2019Europarl-ST: A Multilingual Corpus For Speech Translation Of Parliamentary Debatescited by 114
- 2019Monotonic Infinite Lookback Attention for Simultaneous Machine Translationcited by 104
- 2020SimulEval: An Evaluation Toolkit for Simultaneous Translationcited by 94
- 2019Monotonic Multihead Attentioncited by 93
- 2016Can neural machine translation do simultaneous translation?cited by 86
- 2020Efficient Wait-k Models for Simultaneous Machine Translationcited by 61
- 2018Incremental Decoding and Training Methods for Simultaneous Translation in Neural Machine Translationcited by 52
- 2018Low-Latency Neural Speech Translationcited by 37
- 2019Thinking Slow about Latency Evaluation for Simultaneous Machine Translationcited by 28
4 more
- 2021An Empirical Study of End-to-end Simultaneous Speech Translation Decoding Strategiescited by 14
- 2020ON-TRAC Consortium for End-to-End and Simultaneous Speech Translation Challenge Tasks at IWSLT 2020cited by 9
- 2020Online Versus Offline NMT Quality: An In-depth Analysis on English-German and German-Englishcited by 6
- 2019ON-TRAC Consortium End-to-End Speech Translation Systems for the IWSLT 2019 Shared Taskcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024How "Real" is Your Real-Time Simultaneous Speech-to-Text Translation System?cited by 17
- 2022Exploring Continuous Integrate-and-Fire for Adaptive Simultaneous Speech Translationcited by 14
- 2024Recent Advances in End-to-End Simultaneous Speech Translationcited by 5
- 2021Visualization: the missing factor in Simultaneous Speech Translationcited by 2
- 2024How "Real" is Your Real-Time Simultaneous Speech-to-Text Translation System?24 Dec 2024
- 2024Recent Advances in End-to-End Simultaneous Speech Translation1 Jun 2024
- 2022Exploring Continuous Integrate-and-Fire for Adaptive Simultaneous Speech Translation22 Mar 2022
- 2021Visualization: the missing factor in Simultaneous Speech Translation31 Oct 2021