Breast Mass Detection with Faster R-CNN: On the Feasibility of Learning from Noisy Annotations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work we study the impact of noise on the training of object detection networks for the medical domain, and how it can be mitigated by improving the training procedure. Annotating large medical datasets for training data-hungry deep learning models is expensive and time consuming. Leveraging information that is already collected in clinical practice, in the form of text reports, bookmarks or lesion measurements would substantially reduce this cost. Obtaining precise lesion bounding boxes through automatic mining procedures, however, is difficult. We provide here a quantitative evaluation of the effect of bounding box coordinate noise on the performance of Faster R-CNN object detection networks for breast mass detection. Varying degrees of noise are simulated by randomly modifying the bounding boxes: in our experiments, bounding boxes could be enlarged up to six times the original size. The noise is injected in the CBIS-DDSM collection, a well curated public mammography dataset for which accurate lesion location is available. We show how, due to an imperfect matching between the ground truth and the network bounding box proposals, the noise is propagated during training and reduces the ability of the network to correctly classify lesions from background. When using the standard Intersection over Union criterion, the area under the FROC curve decreases by up to 9%. A novel matching criterion is proposed to improve tolerance to noise.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2021.
Builds on
25 of 58 references.
References · 25
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
- 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,423
- 2019Generalized Intersection over Union: A Metric and A Loss for Bounding Box Regressioncited by 1,368
- 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,186
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
- 2019Distance-IoU Loss: Faster and Better Learning for Bounding Box Regressioncited by 459
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
13 more
- 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
- 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
- 2018Not-so-supervised: a survey of semi-supervised, multi-instance, and transfer learning in medical image analysiscited by 179
- 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
- 2017Deep Learning is Robust to Massive Label Noisecited by 165
- 2019Deep Neural Networks Improve Radiologists' Performance in Breast Cancer Screeningcited by 95
- 2014Training Convolutional Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 48
- 2017Detecting and classifying lesions in mammograms with Deep Learningcited by 47
- 2018NOTE-RCNN: NOise Tolerant Ensemble RCNN for Semi-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 37
- 2019Robust Learning at Noisy Labeled Medical Images: Applied to Skin Lesion Classificationcited by 33
- 2016Breast Mass Classification from Mammograms using Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 12
- 2018How Bad is Good enough: Noisy annotations for instrument pose estimationcited by 1
- 2018Mammographic density: Comparison of visual assessment with fully automatic calculation on a multivendor datasetcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.