mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Question Decomposition with Dependency Graphs

arXiv 2104.08647 ↗First posted 17 Apr 2021cs.CL cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

QDMR is a meaning representation for complex questions, which decomposes questions into a sequence of atomic steps. While state-of-the-art QDMR parsers use the common sequence-to-sequence (seq2seq) approach, a QDMR structure fundamentally describes labeled relations between spans in the input question, and thus dependency-based approaches seem appropriate for this task. In this work, we present a QDMR parser that is based on dependency graphs (DGs), where nodes in the graph are words and edges describe logical relations that correspond to the different computation steps. We propose (a) a non-autoregressive graph parser, where all graph edges are computed simultaneously, and (b) a seq2seq parser that uses gold graph as auxiliary supervision. We find that a graph parser leads to a moderate reduction in performance (0.47 to 0.44), but to a 16x speed-up in inference time due to the non-autoregressive nature of the parser, and to improved sample complexity compared to a seq2seq model. Second, a seq2seq model trained with auxiliary graph supervision has better generalization to new domains compared to a seq2seq model, and also performs better on questions with long sequences of computation steps.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2021.

Builds on

24 of 30 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  5. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  6. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
  7. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  8. 2018Self-Attention with Relative Position Representationscited by 1,112
  9. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 883
  10. 2015Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tablescited by 509
  11. 2018A Corpus for Reasoning About Natural Language Grounded in Photographscited by 457
  12. 2019RAT-SQL: Relation-Aware Schema Encoding and Linking for Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 420
12 more
  1. 2018The Web as a Knowledge-base for Answering Complex Questionscited by 409
  2. 2018AllenNLP: A Deep Semantic Natural Language Processing Platformcited by 347
  3. 2020HybridQA: A Dataset of Multi-Hop Question Answering over Tabular and Textual Datacited by 263
  4. 2016Incorporating Copying Mechanism in Sequence-to-Sequence Learningcited by 217
  5. 2017Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documentscited by 190
  6. 2021MultiModalQA: Complex Question Answering over Text, Tables and Imagescited by 177
  7. 2018Supervising strong learners by amplifying weak expertscited by 139
  8. 2020Break It Down: A Question Understanding Benchmarkcited by 131
  9. 2019Multi-hop Reading Comprehension through Question Decomposition and Rescoringcited by 119
  10. 2020Unsupervised Question Decomposition for Question Answeringcited by 118
  11. 2018Simpler but More Accurate Semantic Dependency Parsingcited by 46
  12. 2020ManyModalQA: Modality Disambiguation and QA over Diverse Inputscited by 38

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

7 papers.