Interval-censored Hawkes processes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Interval-censored data solely records the aggregated counts of events during specific time intervals - such as the number of patients admitted to the hospital or the volume of vehicles passing traffic loop detectors - and not the exact occurrence time of the events. It is currently not understood how to fit the Hawkes point processes to this kind of data. Its typical loss function (the point process log-likelihood) cannot be computed without exact event times. Furthermore, it does not have the independent increments property to use the Poisson likelihood. This work builds a novel point process, a set of tools, and approximations for fitting Hawkes processes within interval-censored data scenarios. First, we define the Mean Behavior Poisson process (MBPP), a novel Poisson process with a direct parameter correspondence to the popular self-exciting Hawkes process. We fit MBPP in the interval-censored setting using an interval-censored Poisson log-likelihood (IC-LL). We use the parameter equivalence to uncover the parameters of the associated Hawkes process. Second, we introduce two novel exogenous functions to distinguish the exogenous from the endogenous events. We propose the multi-impulse exogenous function - for when the exogenous events are observed as event time - and the latent homogeneous Poisson process exogenous function - for when the exogenous events are presented as interval-censored volumes. Third, we provide several approximation methods to estimate the intensity and compensator function of MBPP when no analytical solution exists. Fourth and finally, we connect the interval-censored loss of MBPP to a broader class of Bregman divergence-based functions. Using the connection, we show that the popularity estimation algorithm Hawkes Intensity Process (HIP) is a particular case of the MBPP. We verify our models through empirical testing on synthetic data and real-world data.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 109 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2021.
Builds on
25 of 109 references.
References · 25
- 2015SEISMIC: A Self-Exciting Point Process Model for Predicting Tweet Popularitycited by 76
- 2017A Review of Self-Exciting Spatio-Temporal Point Processes and Their Applicationscited by 40
- 2014Discovering Latent Network Structure in Point Process Datacited by 28
- 2016Expecting to be HIP: Hawkes Intensity Processes for Social Media Popularitycited by 26
- 2016Feature Driven and Point Process Approaches for Popularity Predictioncited by 18
- 2017SIR-Hawkes: Linking Epidemic Models and Hawkes Processes to Model Diffusions in Finite Populationscited by 17
- 2016TiDeH: Time-Dependent Hawkes Process for Predicting Retweet Dynamicscited by 15
- 2018Efficient Non-parametric Bayesian Hawkes Processescited by 15
- 2018#DebateNight: The Role and Influence of Socialbots on Twitter During the 1st 2016 U.S. Presidential Debatecited by 7
- 2019Estimating Attention Flow in Online Video Networkscited by 7
- 2017Learning Hawkes Processes from Short Doubly-Censored Event Sequencescited by 6
- 2018Steering Social Activity: A Stochastic Optimal Control Point Of Viewcited by 6
13 more
- 2019Modeling Information Cascades with Self-exciting Processes via Generalized Epidemic Modelscited by 6
- 2017Online Popularity under Promotion: Viral Potential, Forecasting, and the Economics of Timecited by 5
- 2018PoPPy: A Point Process Toolbox Based on PyTorchcited by 4
- 2018Modeling Popularity in Asynchronous Social Media Streams with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 3
- 2019Quantile Propagation for Wasserstein-Approximate Gaussian Processescited by 3
- 2020Variation across Scales: Measurement Fidelity under Twitter Data Samplingcited by 3
- 2015Evolution of Privacy Loss in Wikipediacited by 2
- 2017THAP: A Matlab Toolkit for Learning with Hawkes Processescited by 2
- 2020A Monte Carlo EM Algorithm for the Parameter Estimation of Aggregated Hawkes Processescited by 2
- 2020Birdspotter: A Tool for Analyzing and Labeling Twitter Userscited by 2
- 2016A Stochastic Differential Equation Framework for Guiding Online User Activities in Closed Loopcited by 1
- 2016RedQueen: An Online Algorithm for Smart Broadcasting in Social Networkscited by 1
- 2018Variational Inference for Gaussian Process with Panel Count Datacited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025Before It's Too Late: A State Space Model for the Early Prediction of Misinformation and Disinformation Engagementcited by 5
- 2022Opinion Market Model: Stemming Far-Right Opinion Spread using Positive Interventionscited by 4
- 2021Linking Across Data Granularity: Fitting Multivariate Hawkes Processes to Partially Interval-Censored Datacited by 2
- 2025Estimating Online Influence Needs Causal Modeling! Counterfactual Analysis of Social Media Engagementcited by 1
- 2024On the Efficient Marginalization of Probabilistic Sequence Modelscited by 0
- 2025Estimating Online Influence Needs Causal Modeling! Counterfactual Analysis of Social Media Engagement25 May 2025
- 2025Before It's Too Late: A State Space Model for the Early Prediction of Misinformation and Disinformation Engagement7 Feb 2025
- 2024On the Efficient Marginalization of Probabilistic Sequence Models6 Mar 2024
- 2022Opinion Market Model: Stemming Far-Right Opinion Spread using Positive Interventions13 Aug 2022
- 2021Linking Across Data Granularity: Fitting Multivariate Hawkes Processes to Partially Interval-Censored Data3 Nov 2021