mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Linking Across Data Granularity: Fitting Multivariate Hawkes Processes to Partially Interval-Censored Data

arXiv 2111.02062 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2021cs.LG cs.CEcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The multivariate Hawkes process (MHP) is widely used for analyzing data streams that interact with each other, where events generate new events within their own dimension (via self-excitation) or across different dimensions (via cross-excitation). However, in certain applications, the timestamps of individual events in some dimensions are unobservable, and only event counts within intervals are known, referred to as partially interval-censored data. The MHP is unsuitable for handling such data since its estimation requires event timestamps. In this study, we introduce the Partially Censored Multivariate Hawkes Process (PCMHP), a novel point process which shares parameter equivalence with the MHP and can effectively model both timestamped and interval-censored data. We demonstrate the capabilities of the PCMHP using synthetic and real-world datasets. Firstly, we illustrate that the PCMHP can approximate MHP parameters and recover the spectral radius using synthetic event histories. Next, we assess the performance of the PCMHP in predicting YouTube popularity and find that the PCMHP outperforms the popularity estimation algorithm Hawkes Intensity Process (HIP). Comparing with the fully interval-censored HIP, we show that the PCMHP improves prediction performance by accounting for point process dimensions, particularly when there exist significant cross-dimension interactions. Lastly, we leverage the PCMHP to gain qualitative insights from a dataset comprising daily COVID-19 case counts from multiple countries and COVID-19-related news articles. By clustering the PCMHP-modeled countries, we unveil hidden interaction patterns between occurrences of COVID-19 cases and news reporting.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2021.

Builds on

14 of 54 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015SEISMIC: A Self-Exciting Point Process Model for Predicting Tweet Popularitycited by 76
  2. 2016Expecting to be HIP: Hawkes Intensity Processes for Social Media Popularitycited by 26
  3. 2014Modeling and Predicting Popularity Dynamics via Reinforced Poisson Processescited by 20
  4. 2016Feature Driven and Point Process Approaches for Popularity Predictioncited by 18
  5. 2017SIR-Hawkes: Linking Epidemic Models and Hawkes Processes to Model Diffusions in Finite Populationscited by 17
  6. 2016TiDeH: Time-Dependent Hawkes Process for Predicting Retweet Dynamicscited by 15
  7. 2017A Tutorial on Hawkes Processes for Events in Social Mediacited by 15
  8. 2019Estimating Attention Flow in Online Video Networkscited by 7
  9. 2016Multivariate Hawkes Processes for Large-scale Inferencecited by 6
  10. 2021Interval-censored Hawkes processescited by 5
  11. 2019Modelling Online Comment Threads from their Startcited by 2
  12. 2020A Monte Carlo EM Algorithm for the Parameter Estimation of Aggregated Hawkes Processescited by 2
2 more
  1. 2020Spectral estimation of Hawkes processes from count datacited by 2
  2. 2021A Parameter Estimation Method for Multivariate Aggregated Hawkes Processescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.