Reward Optimization for Neural Machine Translation with Learned Metrics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural machine translation (NMT) models are conventionally trained with token-level negative log-likelihood (NLL), which does not guarantee that the generated translations will be optimized for a selected sequence-level evaluation metric. Multiple approaches are proposed to train NMT with BLEU as the reward, in order to directly improve the metric. However, it was reported that the gain in BLEU does not translate to real quality improvement, limiting the application in industry. Recently, it became clear to the community that BLEU has a low correlation with human judgment when dealing with state-of-the-art models. This leads to the emerging of model-based evaluation metrics. These new metrics are shown to have a much higher human correlation. In this paper, we investigate whether it is beneficial to optimize NMT models with the state-of-the-art model-based metric, BLEURT. We propose a contrastive-margin loss for fast and stable reward optimization suitable for large NMT models. In experiments, we perform automatic and human evaluations to compare models trained with smoothed BLEU and BLEURT to the baseline models. Results show that the reward optimization with BLEURT is able to increase the metric scores by a large margin, in contrast to limited gain when training with smoothed BLEU. The human evaluation shows that models trained with BLEURT improve adequacy and coverage of translations. Code is available via https://github.com/naver-ai/MetricMT.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2021.
Builds on
25 of 49 references.
References · 25
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
- 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,471
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
- 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 568
- 2018Meta-learning with differentiable closed-form solverscited by 395
- 2018Scaling Neural Machine Translationcited by 204
- 2016Enhanced LSTM for Natural Language Inferencecited by 199
- 2020Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metricscited by 155
13 more
- 2016Sequence-to-Sequence Learning as Beam-Search Optimizationcited by 126
- 2015Minimum Risk Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 114
- 2019Beyond BLEU: Training Neural Machine Translation with Semantic Similaritycited by 84
- 2019On the Weaknesses of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 82
- 2020A Generic First-Order Algorithmic Framework for Bi-Level Programming Beyond Lower-Level Singletoncited by 78
- 2018A Study of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 74
- 2018NSML: Meet the MLaaS platform with a real-world case studycited by 70
- 2017Classical Structured Prediction Losses for Sequence to Sequence Learningcited by 55
- 2020Convergence Properties of Stochastic Hypergradientscited by 19
- 2019Distilling Knowledge Learned in BERT for Text Generationcited by 5
- 2020BERT as a Teacher: Contextual Embeddings for Sequence-Level Rewardcited by 5
- 2020MLE-guided parameter search for task loss minimization in neural sequence modelingcited by 4
- 2020Single-level Optimization For Differential Architecture Searchcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.
12 papers.
- 2022Repairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Textcited by 154
- 2021Learning Compact Metrics for MTcited by 93
- 2024A Dense Reward View on Aligning Text-to-Image Diffusion with Preferencecited by 55
- 2023Preference-grounded Token-level Guidance for Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 31
- 2023ESRL: Efficient Sampling-based Reinforcement Learning for Sequence Generationcited by 15
- 2025Segmenting Text and Learning Their Rewards for Improved RLHF in Language Modelcited by 12
- 2023Learning Evaluation Models from Large Language Models for Sequence Generationcited by 6
- 2024LLM See, LLM Do: Guiding Data Generation to Target Non-Differentiable Objectivescited by 6
- 2025Adding Chocolate to Mint: Mitigating Metric Interference in Machine Translationcited by 6
- 2025Reward Models are Metrics in a Trench Coatcited by 2
- 2021Doubly-Trained Adversarial Data Augmentation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1
- 2022GROOT: Corrective Reward Optimization for Generative Sequential Labelingcited by 1
- 2025Reward Models are Metrics in a Trench Coat3 Oct 2025
- 2025Adding Chocolate to Mint: Mitigating Metric Interference in Machine Translation11 Mar 2025
- 2025Segmenting Text and Learning Their Rewards for Improved RLHF in Language Model6 Jan 2025
- 2024LLM See, LLM Do: Guiding Data Generation to Target Non-Differentiable Objectives1 Jul 2024
- 2024A Dense Reward View on Aligning Text-to-Image Diffusion with Preference13 Feb 2024
- 2023Learning Evaluation Models from Large Language Models for Sequence Generation8 Aug 2023
- 2023ESRL: Efficient Sampling-based Reinforcement Learning for Sequence Generation4 Aug 2023
- 2023Preference-grounded Token-level Guidance for Language Model Fine-tuning1 Jun 2023
- 2022GROOT: Corrective Reward Optimization for Generative Sequential Labeling29 Sep 2022
- 2022Repairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Text14 Feb 2022
- 2021Learning Compact Metrics for MT12 Oct 2021
- 2021Doubly-Trained Adversarial Data Augmentation for Neural Machine Translation12 Oct 2021