mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Plot-guided Adversarial Example Construction for Evaluating Open-domain Story Generation

arXiv 2104.05801 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2021cs.CL cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the recent advances of open-domain story generation, the lack of reliable automatic evaluation metrics becomes an increasingly imperative issue that hinders the fast development of story generation. According to conducted researches in this regard, learnable evaluation metrics have promised more accurate assessments by having higher correlations with human judgments. A critical bottleneck of obtaining a reliable learnable evaluation metric is the lack of high-quality training data for classifiers to efficiently distinguish plausible and implausible machine-generated stories. Previous works relied on textitheuristically manipulated plausible examples to mimic possible system drawbacks such as repetition, contradiction, or irrelevant content in the text level, which can be textitunnatural and textitoversimplify the characteristics of implausible machine-generated stories. We propose to tackle these issues by generating a more comprehensive set of implausible stories using em plots, which are structured representations of controllable factors used to generate stories. Since these plots are compact and structured, it is easier to manipulate them to generate text with targeted undesirable properties, while at the same time maintain the grammatical correctness and naturalness of the generated sentences. To improve the quality of generated implausible stories, we further apply the adversarial filtering procedure presented by citetzellers2018swag to select a more nuanced set of implausible texts. Experiments show that the evaluation metrics trained on our generated data result in more reliable automatic assessments that correlate remarkably better with human judgments compared to the baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2021.

Builds on

22 of 33 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  4. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,413
  5. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  6. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
  7. 2020Reformer: The Efficient Transformercited by 1,668
  8. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  9. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
  10. 2019DialoGPT: Large-Scale Generative Pre-training for Conversational Response Generationcited by 842
  11. 2019COMET: Commonsense Transformers for Automatic Knowledge Graph Constructioncited by 450
  12. 2018SWAG: A Large-Scale Adversarial Dataset for Grounded Commonsense Inferencecited by 333
10 more
  1. 2018Plan-And-Write: Towards Better Automatic Storytellingcited by 234
  2. 2019Strategies for Structuring Story Generationcited by 124
  3. 2018Learning to Write with Cooperative Discriminatorscited by 119
  4. 2020PlotMachines: Outline-Conditioned Generation with Dynamic Plot State Trackingcited by 105
  5. 2020Content Planning for Neural Story Generation with Aristotelian Rescoringcited by 92
  6. 2020UNION: An Unreferenced Metric for Evaluating Open-ended Story Generationcited by 60
  7. 2019Plan, Write, and Revise: an Interactive System for Open-Domain Story Generationcited by 43
  8. 2016Neural Net Models for Open-Domain Discourse Coherencecited by 23
  9. 2018Discourse Coherence in the Wild: A Dataset, Evaluation and Methodscited by 20
  10. 2020Cue Me In: Content-Inducing Approaches to Interactive Story Generationcited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 5; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: