Confidence-Optimal Random Embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The seminal result of Johnson and Lindenstrauss on random embeddings has been intensively studied in applied and theoretical computer science. Despite that vast body of literature, we still lack of complete understanding of statistical properties of random projections; a particularly intriguing question is: why are the theoretical bounds that far behind the empirically observed performance? Motivated by this question, this work develops Johnson-Lindenstrauss distributions with optimal, data-oblivious, statistical confidence bounds. These bounds are numerically best possible, for any given data dimension, embedding dimension, and distortion tolerance. They improve upon prior works in terms of statistical accuracy, as well as exactly determine the no-go regimes for data-oblivious approaches. Furthermore, the corresponding projection matrices are efficiently samplable. The construction relies on orthogonal matrices, and the proof uses certain elegant properties of the unit sphere. The following techniques introduced in this work are of independent interest: a) a compact expression for distortion in terms of singular eigenvalues of the projection matrix, b) a parametrization linking the unit sphere and the Dirichlet distribution and c) anti-concentration bounds for the Dirichlet distribution. Besides the technical contribution, the paper presents applications and numerical evaluation along with working implementation in Python.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2021.
Builds on
8 of 67 references.
References · 8
- 2018Performance of Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transform for k-Means and k-Medians Clusteringcited by 53
- 2018On the Non-asymptotic and Sharp Lower Tail Bounds of Random Variablescited by 19
- 2013Toward a unified theory of sparse dimensionality reduction in Euclidean spacecited by 15
- 2014The Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma is optimal for linear dimensionality reductioncited by 12
- 2017On Using Toeplitz and Circulant Matrices for Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transformscited by 6
- 2014Compressive classification and the rare eclipse problemcited by 4
- 2014Johnson-Lindenstrauss Compression with Neuroscience-Based Constraintscited by 4
- 2015Low rank approximation and decomposition of large matrices using error correcting codescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.