Johnson-Lindenstrauss Compression with Neuroscience-Based Constraints
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) matrices implemented by sparse random synaptic connections are thought to be a prime candidate for how convergent pathways in the brain compress information. However, to date, there is no complete mathematical support for such implementations given the constraints of real neural tissue. The fact that neurons are either excitatory or inhibitory implies that every so implementable JL matrix must be sign-consistent (i.e., all entries in a single column must be either all non-negative or all non-positive), and the fact that any given neuron connects to a relatively small subset of other neurons implies that the JL matrix had better be sparse. We construct sparse JL matrices that are sign-consistent, and prove that our construction is essentially optimal. Our work answers a mathematical question that was triggered by earlier work and is necessary to justify the existence of JL compression in the brain, and emphasizes that inhibition is crucial if neurons are to perform efficient, correlation-preserving compression.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2014.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021An Introduction to Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transformscited by 11
- 2021Tensor Random Projection for Low Memory Dimension Reductioncited by 7
- 2024A rank decomposition for the topological classification of neural representationscited by 1
- 2021Confidence-Optimal Random Embeddingscited by 0
- 2024A rank decomposition for the topological classification of neural representations30 Apr 2024
- 2021Tensor Random Projection for Low Memory Dimension Reduction30 Apr 2021
- 2021Confidence-Optimal Random Embeddings6 Apr 2021
- 2021An Introduction to Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transforms28 Feb 2021