mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Neural Pre-Conditioning Active Learning Algorithm to Reduce Label Complexity

arXiv 2104.03525 ↗First posted 8 Apr 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning (DL) algorithms rely on massive amounts of labeled data. Semi-supervised learning (SSL) and active learning (AL) aim to reduce this label complexity by leveraging unlabeled data or carefully acquiring labels, respectively. In this work, we primarily focus on designing an AL algorithm but first argue for a change in how AL algorithms should be evaluated. Although unlabeled data is readily available in pool-based AL, AL algorithms are usually evaluated by measuring the increase in supervised learning (SL) performance at consecutive acquisition steps. Because this measures performance gains from both newly acquired instances and newly acquired labels, we propose to instead evaluate the label efficiency of AL algorithms by measuring the increase in SSL performance at consecutive acquisition steps. After surveying tools that can be used to this end, we propose our neural pre-conditioning (NPC) algorithm inspired by a Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) analysis. Our algorithm incorporates the classifier's uncertainty on unlabeled data and penalizes redundant samples within candidate batches to efficiently acquire a diverse set of informative labels. Furthermore, we prove that NPC improves downstream training in the large-width regime in a manner previously observed to correlate with generalization. Comparisons with other AL algorithms show that a state-of-the-art SSL algorithm coupled with NPC can achieve high performance using very few labeled data.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2021.

Builds on

22 of 49 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  3. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  4. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  5. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  6. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,054
  7. 2018A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterizationcited by 784
  8. 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 602
  9. 2018Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networkscited by 572
  10. 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 572
  11. 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 562
  12. 2019BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learningcited by 428
10 more
  1. 2020Spectrum Dependent Learning Curves in Kernel Regression and Wide Neural Networkscited by 200
  2. 2017Cost-Effective Active Learning for Deep Image Classificationcited by 165
  3. 2020Finite Versus Infinite Neural Networks: an Empirical Studycited by 156
  4. 2020Distribution Aligning Refinery of Pseudo-label for Imbalanced Semi-supervised Learningcited by 105
  5. 2019Discriminative Active Learningcited by 97
  6. 2019Asymmetric Valleys: Beyond Sharp and Flat Local Minimacited by 90
  7. 2019Harnessing the Power of Infinitely Wide Deep Nets on Small-data Taskscited by 87
  8. 2018There Are Many Consistent Explanations of Unlabeled Data: Why You Should Averagecited by 82
  9. 2016Active Learning for Speech Recognition: the Power of Gradientscited by 25
  10. 2019Combining MixMatch and Active Learning for Better Accuracy with Fewer Labelscited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

7 papers.