mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

NTKCPL: Active Learning on Top of Self-Supervised Model by Estimating True Coverage

arXiv 2306.04099 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2023cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

High annotation cost for training machine learning classifiers has driven extensive research in active learning and self-supervised learning. Recent research has shown that in the context of supervised learning different active learning strategies need to be applied at various stages of the training process to ensure improved performance over the random baseline. We refer to the point where the number of available annotations changes the suitable active learning strategy as the phase transition point. In this paper, we establish that when combining active learning with self-supervised models to achieve improved performance, the phase transition point occurs earlier. It becomes challenging to determine which strategy should be used for previously unseen datasets. We argue that existing active learning algorithms are heavily influenced by the phase transition because the empirical risk over the entire active learning pool estimated by these algorithms is inaccurate and influenced by the number of labeled samples. To address this issue, we propose a novel active learning strategy, neural tangent kernel clustering-pseudo-labels (NTKCPL). It estimates empirical risk based on pseudo-labels and the model prediction with NTK approximation. We analyze the factors affecting this approximation error and design a pseudo-label clustering generation method to reduce the approximation error. We validate our method on five datasets, empirically demonstrating that it outperforms the baseline methods in most cases and is valid over a wider range of training budgets.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2023.

Builds on

36 of 44 references.

References · 36

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  4. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  5. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  6. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
  7. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  8. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,375
  9. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
  10. 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 602
  11. 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 572
  12. 2019BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learningcited by 428
24 more
  1. 2020SCAN: Learning to Classify Images without Labelscited by 351
  2. 2019Learning Loss for Active Learningcited by 335
  3. 2019Variational Adversarial Active Learningcited by 284
  4. 2017Suggestive Annotation: A Deep Active Learning Framework for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 145
  5. 2022Active Learning on a Budget: Opposite Strategies Suit High and Low Budgetscited by 131
  6. 2021Batch Active Learning at Scalecited by 127
  7. 2019Deep Active Learning: Unified and Principled Method for Query and Trainingcited by 92
  8. 2022Active Learning Through a Covering Lenscited by 62
  9. 2019Bayesian Generative Active Deep Learningcited by 57
  10. 2022BoostMIS: Boosting Medical Image Semi-supervised Learning with Adaptive Pseudo Labeling and Informative Active Annotationcited by 54
  11. 2020Towards Robust and Reproducible Active Learning Using Neural Networkscited by 53
  12. 2021Reducing Label Effort: Self-Supervised meets Active Learningcited by 42
  13. 2019Parting with Illusions about Deep Active Learningcited by 38
  14. 2023Active Finetuning: Exploiting Annotation Budget in the Pretraining-Finetuning Paradigmcited by 36
  15. 2021Low Budget Active Learning via Wasserstein Distance: An Integer Programming Approachcited by 34
  16. 2021Deep Active Learning by Leveraging Training Dynamicscited by 32
  17. 2022A Fast, Well-Founded Approximation to the Empirical Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 30
  18. 2021Active Learning at the ImageNet Scalecited by 28
  19. 2022Making Look-Ahead Active Learning Strategies Feasible with Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 25
  20. 2020On the Marginal Benefit of Active Learning: Does Self-Supervision Eat Its Cake?cited by 18
  21. 2020Semi-supervised Batch Active Learning via Bilevel Optimizationcited by 16
  22. 2021A Simple Baseline for Low-Budget Active Learningcited by 15
  23. 2021A Neural Pre-Conditioning Active Learning Algorithm to Reduce Label Complexitycited by 7
  24. 2022Active Self-Semi-Supervised Learning for Few Labeled Samplescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.

3 papers.