mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Learning of Conjugate Mappings

arXiv 2104.01874 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2021math.DS cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite many of the most common chaotic dynamical systems being continuous in time, it is through discrete time mappings that much of the understanding of chaos is formed. Henri Poincar'e first made this connection by tracking consecutive iterations of the continuous flow with a lower-dimensional, transverse subspace. The mapping that iterates the dynamics through consecutive intersections of the flow with the subspace is now referred to as a Poincar'e map, and it is the primary method available for interpreting and classifying chaotic dynamics. Unfortunately, in all but the simplest systems, an explicit form for such a mapping remains outstanding. This work proposes a method for obtaining explicit Poincar'e mappings by using deep learning to construct an invertible coordinate transformation into a conjugate representation where the dynamics are governed by a relatively simple chaotic mapping. The invertible change of variable is based on an autoencoder, which allows for dimensionality reduction, and has the advantage of classifying chaotic systems using the equivalence relation of topological conjugacies. Indeed, the enforcement of topological conjugacies is the critical neural network regularization for learning the coordinate and dynamics pairing. We provide expository applications of the method to low-dimensional systems such as the R"ossler and Lorenz systems, while also demonstrating the utility of the method on infinite-dimensional systems, such as the Kuramoto--Sivashinsky equation.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2021.

Builds on

23 of 86 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  2. 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,341
  3. 2020Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equationscited by 722
  4. 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 617
  5. 2017Self-Normalizing Neural Networkscited by 591
  6. 2017Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamicscited by 491
  7. 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 461
  8. 2020Lagrangian Neural Networkscited by 388
  9. 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 380
  10. 2017Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part I): Data-driven Solutions of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 362
  11. 2020Universal Differential Equations for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 345
  12. 2020Multipole Graph Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 343
11 more
  1. 2021Modern Koopman Theory for Dynamical Systemscited by 269
  2. 2017Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part II): Data-driven Discovery of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 158
  3. 2017VAMPnets: Deep learning of molecular kineticscited by 135
  4. 2020SINDy-PI: A Robust Algorithm for Parallel Implicit Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamicscited by 125
  5. 2017Sparse learning of stochastic dynamic equationscited by 76
  6. 2017Time-lagged autoencoders: Deep learning of slow collective variables for molecular kineticscited by 64
  7. 2019Learning Symbolic Physics with Graph Networkscited by 52
  8. 2020SINDy-BVP: Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics for Boundary Value Problemscited by 22
  9. 2018Discovering conservation laws from data for controlcited by 14
  10. 2020Sparse Identification of Slow Timescale Dynamicscited by 10
  11. 2020Data-Driven Stabilization of Periodic Orbitscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

5 papers.