mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Distributed Reinforcement Learning for Age of Information Minimization in Real-Time IoT Systems

arXiv 2104.01527 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2021cs.IT cs.LG math.ITcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, the problem of minimizing the weighted sum of age of information (AoI) and total energy consumption of Internet of Things (IoT) devices is studied. In the considered model, each IoT device monitors a physical process that follows nonlinear dynamics. As the dynamics of the physical process vary over time, each device must find an optimal sampling frequency to sample the real-time dynamics of the physical system and send sampled information to a base station (BS). Due to limited wireless resources, the BS can only select a subset of devices to transmit their sampled information. Thus, edge devices must cooperatively sample their monitored dynamics based on the local observations and the BS must collect the sampled information from the devices immediately, hence avoiding the additional time and energy used for sampling and information transmission. To this end, it is necessary to jointly optimize the sampling policy of each device and the device selection scheme of the BS so as to accurately monitor the dynamics of the physical process using minimum energy. This problem is formulated as an optimization problem whose goal is to minimize the weighted sum of AoI cost and energy consumption. To solve this problem, we propose a novel distributed reinforcement learning (RL) approach for the sampling policy optimization. The proposed algorithm enables edge devices to cooperatively find the global optimal sampling policy using their own local observations. Given the sampling policy, the device selection scheme can be optimized thus minimizing the weighted sum of AoI and energy consumption of all devices. Simulations with real data of PM 2.5 pollution show that the proposed algorithm can reduce the sum of AoI by up to 17.8% and 33.9% and the total energy consumption by up to 13.2% and 35.1%, compared to a conventional deep Q network method and a uniform sampling policy.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2021.

Builds on

13 of 31 references.

References · 13

  1. 2016HyperNetworkscited by 1,027
  2. 2019A Joint Learning and Communications Framework for Federated Learning over Wireless Networkscited by 263
  3. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Q-Learningcited by 215
  4. 2020Distributed Multi-agent Meta Learning for Trajectory Design in Wireless Drone Networkscited by 28
  5. 2020Cooperative Internet of UAVs: Distributed Trajectory Design by Multi-agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 18
  6. 2018Joint Status Sampling and Updating for Minimizing Age of Information in the Internet of Thingscited by 10
  7. 2019A Reinforcement Learning Framework for Optimizing Age-of-Information in RF-powered Communication Systemscited by 10
  8. 2019Deep Learning for Optimal Deployment of UAVs with Visible Light Communicationscited by 7
  9. 2020A Machine Learning Approach for Task and Resource Allocation in Mobile Edge Computing Based Networkscited by 7
  10. 2018Reinforcement Learning Based Scheduling Algorithm for Optimizing Age of Information in Ultra Reliable Low Latency Networkscited by 3
  11. 2019Optimizing Information Freshness in Computing enabled IoT Networkscited by 3
  12. 2019Closed-Form Analysis of Non-Linear Age-of-Information in Status Updates with an Energy Harvesting Transmittercited by 2
1 more
  1. 2021Optimizing Information Freshness for Cooperative IoT Systems with Stochastic Arrivalscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.

10 papers.