mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Automated freezing of gait assessment with marker-based motion capture and multi-stage spatial-temporal graph convolutional neural networks

arXiv 2103.15449 ↗First posted 29 Mar 2021cs.CVcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Freezing of gait (FOG) is a common and debilitating gait impairment in Parkinson's disease. Further insight into this phenomenon is hampered by the difficulty to objectively assess FOG. To meet this clinical need, this paper proposes an automated motion-capture-based FOG assessment method driven by a novel deep neural network. Automated FOG assessment can be formulated as an action segmentation problem, where temporal models are tasked to recognize and temporally localize the FOG segments in untrimmed motion capture trials. This paper takes a closer look at the performance of state-of-the-art action segmentation models when tasked to automatically assess FOG. Furthermore, a novel deep neural network architecture is proposed that aims to better capture the spatial and temporal dependencies than the state-of-the-art baselines. The proposed network, termed multi-stage spatial-temporal graph convolutional network (MS-GCN), combines the spatial-temporal graph convolutional network (ST-GCN) and the multi-stage temporal convolutional network (MS-TCN). The ST-GCN captures the hierarchical spatial-temporal motion among the joints inherent to motion capture, while the multi-stage component reduces over-segmentation errors by refining the predictions over multiple stages. The experiments indicate that the proposed model outperforms four state-of-the-art baselines. Moreover, FOG outcomes derived from MS-GCN predictions had an excellent (r=0.93 [0.87, 0.97]) and moderately strong (r=0.75 [0.55, 0.87]) linear relationship with FOG outcomes derived from manual annotations. The proposed MS-GCN may provide an automated and objective alternative to labor-intensive clinician-based FOG assessment. Future work is now possible that aims to assess the generalization of MS-GCN to a larger and more varied verification cohort.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2021.

Builds on

18 of 89 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  4. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  5. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
  6. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  7. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  8. 2018An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,447
  9. 2018Spatial Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks for Skeleton-Based Action Recognitioncited by 1,199
  10. 2018OpenPose: Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation using Part Affinity Fieldscited by 1,161
  11. 2015Multi-Scale Context Aggregation by Dilated Convolutionscited by 1,128
  12. 2016Temporal Convolutional Networks for Action Segmentation and Detectioncited by 504
6 more
  1. 2019MS-TCN: Multi-Stage Temporal Convolutional Network for Action Segmentationcited by 370
  2. 2018Markerless tracking of user-defined features with deep learningcited by 203
  3. 2016Connectionist Temporal Modeling for Weakly Supervised Action Labelingcited by 70
  4. 2015An end-to-end generative framework for video segmentation and recognitioncited by 61
  5. 2018Explaining the Unique Nature of Individual Gait Patterns with Deep Learningcited by 17
  6. 2019Feature-Set-Engineering for Detecting Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease using Deep Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 6.

10 papers.