mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Continuous Cost-to-Go Functions for Non-holonomic Systems

arXiv 2103.11168 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2021cs.RO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents a supervised learning method to generate continuous cost-to-go functions of non-holonomic systems directly from the workspace description. Supervision from informative examples reduces training time and improves network performance. The manifold representing the optimal trajectories of a non-holonomic system has high-curvature regions which can not be efficiently captured with uniform sampling. To address this challenge, we present an adaptive sampling method which makes use of sampling-based planners along with local, closed-form solutions to generate training samples. The cost-to-go function over a specific workspace is represented as a neural network whose weights are generated by a second, higher order network. The networks are trained in an end-to-end fashion. In our previous work, this architecture was shown to successfully learn to generate the cost-to-go functions of holonomic systems using uniform sampling. In this work, we show that uniform sampling fails for non-holonomic systems. However, with the proposed adaptive sampling methodology, our network can generate near-optimal trajectories for non-holonomic systems while avoiding obstacles. Experiments show that our method is two orders of magnitude faster compared to traditional approaches in cluttered environments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2021.

Builds on

17 of 38 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
  2. 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 328
  3. 2021End-to-end Interpretable Neural Motion Plannercited by 242
  4. 2016Value Iteration Networkscited by 160
  5. 2017Learning Sampling Distributions for Robot Motion Planningcited by 82
  6. 2018Motion Planning Networkscited by 80
  7. 2019Dynamical Distance Learning for Semi-Supervised and Unsupervised Skill Discoverycited by 68
  8. 2017Learning What Data to Learncited by 21
  9. 2019LEGO: Leveraging Experience in Roadmap Generation for Sampling-Based Planningcited by 19
  10. 2019Learned Critical Probabilistic Roadmaps for Robotic Motion Planningcited by 18
  11. 2014Asymptotically Optimal Sampling-based Kinodynamic Planningcited by 17
  12. 2018Probabilistic completeness of RRT for geometric and kinodynamic planning with forward propagationcited by 9
5 more
  1. 2020Dynamically Constrained Motion Planning Networks for Non-Holonomic Robotscited by 9
  2. 2015Asymptotically Optimal Planning by Feasible Kinodynamic Planning in State-Cost Spacecited by 8
  3. 2019Learn and Link: Learning Critical Regions for Efficient Planningcited by 7
  4. 2019Higher-Order Function Networks for Learning Composable 3D Object Representationscited by 6
  5. 2020Cost-to-Go Function Generating Networks for High Dimensional Motion Planningcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.