mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Predicting Early Dropout: Calibration and Algorithmic Fairness Considerations

arXiv 2103.09068 ↗First posted 16 Mar 2021cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, the problem of predicting dropout risk in undergraduate studies is addressed from a perspective of algorithmic fairness. We develop a machine learning method to predict the risks of university dropout and underperformance. The objective is to understand if such a system can identify students at risk while avoiding potential discriminatory biases. When modeling both risks, we obtain prediction models with an Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) of 0.77-0.78 based on the data available at the enrollment time, before the first year of studies starts. This data includes the students' demographics, the high school they attended, and their admission (average) grade. Our models are calibrated: they produce estimated probabilities for each risk, not mere scores. We analyze if this method leads to discriminatory outcomes for some sensitive groups in terms of prediction accuracy (AUC) and error rates (Generalized False Positive Rate, GFPR, or Generalized False Negative Rate, GFNR). The models exhibit some equity in terms of AUC and GFNR along groups. The similar GFNR means a similar probability of failing to detect risk for students who drop out. The disparities in GFPR are addressed through a mitigation process that does not affect the calibration of the model.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2021.

Builds on

11 of 38 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  4. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  5. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  6. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
  7. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  8. 2020Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 194
  9. 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 139
  10. 2020Algorithmic Fairness in Educationcited by 44
  11. 2016Predicting Student Dropout in Higher Educationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.