mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Invertible Residual Network with Regularization for Effective Medical Image Segmentation

arXiv 2103.09042 ↗First posted 16 Mar 2021eess.IV cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) i.e. Residual Networks (ResNets) have been used successfully for many computer vision tasks, but are difficult to scale to 3D volumetric medical data. Memory is increasingly often the bottleneck when training 3D Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). Recently, invertible neural networks have been applied to significantly reduce activation memory footprint when training neural networks with backpropagation thanks to the invertible functions that allow retrieving its input from its output without storing intermediate activations in memory to perform the backpropagation. Among many successful network architectures, 3D Unet has been established as a standard architecture for volumetric medical segmentation. Thus, we choose 3D Unet as a baseline for a non-invertible network and we then extend it with the invertible residual network. In this paper, we proposed two versions of the invertible Residual Network, namely Partially Invertible Residual Network (Partially-InvRes) and Fully Invertible Residual Network (Fully-InvRes). In Partially-InvRes, the invertible residual layer is defined by a technique called additive coupling whereas in Fully-InvRes, both invertible upsampling and downsampling operations are learned based on squeezing (known as pixel shuffle). Furthermore, to avoid the overfitting problem because of less training data, a variational auto-encoder (VAE) branch is added to reconstruct the input volumetric data itself. Our results indicate that by using partially/fully invertible networks as the central workhorse in volumetric segmentation, we not only reduce memory overhead but also achieve compatible segmentation performance compared against the non-invertible 3D Unet. We have demonstrated the proposed networks on various volumetric datasets such as iSeg 2019 and BraTS 2020.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2021.

Builds on

11 of 17 references.

References · 11

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
  3. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  4. 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,471
  5. 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,187
  6. 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,052
  7. 2016Training Deep Nets with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 825
  8. 20183D MRI brain tumor segmentation using autoencoder regularizationcited by 324
  9. 2017The Reversible Residual Network: Backpropagation Without Storing Activationscited by 215
  10. 2017End-to-end Training for Whole Image Breast Cancer Diagnosis using An All Convolutional Designcited by 87
  11. 2018No New-Netcited by 61

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.

2 papers.