Accessibility in Software Practice: A Practitioner's Perspective
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Being able to access software in daily life is vital for everyone, and thus accessibility is a fundamental challenge for software development. However, given the number of accessibility issues reported by many users, e.g., in app reviews, it is not clear if accessibility is widely integrated into current software projects and how software projects address accessibility issues. In this paper, we report a study of the critical challenges and benefits of incorporating accessibility into software development and design. We applied a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach for gathering data from 15 interviews and 365 survey respondents from 26 countries across five continents to understand how practitioners perceive accessibility development and design in practice. We got 44 statements grouped into eight topics on accessibility from practitioners' viewpoints and different software development stages. Our statistical analysis reveals substantial gaps between groups, e.g., practitioners have Direct v.s. Indirect accessibility relevant work experience when they reviewed the summarized statements. These gaps might hinder the quality of accessibility development and design, and we use our findings to establish a set of guidelines to help practitioners be aware of accessibility challenges and benefit factors. We also propose some remedies to resolve the gaps and to highlight key future research directions.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2024A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistantscited by 76
- 2023AXNav: Replaying Accessibility Tests from Natural Languagecited by 31
- 2025AccessGuru: Leveraging LLMs to Detect and Correct Web Accessibility Violations in HTML Codecited by 4
- 2025A Benchmark for Localizing Code and Non-Code Issues in Software Projectscited by 4
- 2024Automated Code Fix Suggestions for Accessibility Issues in Mobile Appscited by 2
- 2025From Questions to Insights: Exploring XAI Challenges Reported on Stack Overflow Questionscited by 0
- 2026Human-Aligned Enhancement of Programming Answers with LLMs Guided by User Feedbackcited by 0
- 2026Agentic Web Accessibility Auditing: A Criterion-Specific Framework for Translating WCAG Requirements into Assessmentscited by 0
- 2026Agentic Web Accessibility Auditing: A Criterion-Specific Framework for Translating WCAG Requirements into Assessments8 Sep 2026
- 2026Human-Aligned Enhancement of Programming Answers with LLMs Guided by User Feedback24 Jan 2026
- 2025A Benchmark for Localizing Code and Non-Code Issues in Software Projects26 Sep 2025
- 2025AccessGuru: Leveraging LLMs to Detect and Correct Web Accessibility Violations in HTML Code24 Jul 2025
- 2025From Questions to Insights: Exploring XAI Challenges Reported on Stack Overflow Questions3 Apr 2025
- 2024Automated Code Fix Suggestions for Accessibility Issues in Mobile Apps7 Aug 2024
- 2024A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants21 Mar 2024
- 2023AXNav: Replaying Accessibility Tests from Natural Language3 Oct 2023