mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Juggling With Representations: On the Information Transfer Between Imagery, Point Clouds, and Meshes for Multi-Modal Semantics

arXiv 2103.07348 ↗First posted 12 Mar 2021cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The automatic semantic segmentation of the huge amount of acquired remote sensing data has become an important task in the last decade. Images and Point Clouds (PCs) are fundamental data representations, particularly in urban mapping applications. Textured 3D meshes integrate both data representations geometrically by wiring the PC and texturing the surface elements with available imagery. We present a mesh-centered holistic geometry-driven methodology that explicitly integrates entities of imagery, PC and mesh. Due to its integrative character, we choose the mesh as the core representation that also helps to solve the visibility problem for points in imagery. Utilizing the proposed multi-modal fusion as the backbone and considering the established entity relationships, we enable the sharing of information across the modalities imagery, PC and mesh in a two-fold manner: (i) feature transfer and (ii) label transfer. By these means, we achieve to enrich feature vectors to multi-modal feature vectors for each representation. Concurrently, we achieve to label all representations consistently while reducing the manual label effort to a single representation. Consequently, we facilitate to train machine learning algorithms and to semantically segment any of these data representations - both in a multi-modal and single-modal sense. The paper presents the association mechanism and the subsequent information transfer, which we believe are cornerstones for multi-modal scene analysis. Furthermore, we discuss the preconditions and limitations of the presented approach in detail. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our methodology on the ISPRS 3D semantic labeling contest (Vaihingen 3D) and a proprietary data set (Hessigheim 3D).

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2021.

Builds on

20 of 59 references.

References · 20

  1. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
  2. 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,401
  3. 2017ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenescited by 3,117
  4. 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,048
  5. 20173D Semantic Segmentation with Submanifold Sparse Convolutional Networkscited by 748
  6. 2020Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 660
  7. 2015Multi-view Convolutional Neural Networks for 3D Shape Recognitioncited by 565
  8. 2017Joint 2D-3D-Semantic Data for Indoor Scene Understandingcited by 406
  9. 2017Large-scale Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation with Superpoint Graphscited by 385
  10. 2017Semantic3D.net: A new Large-scale Point Cloud Classification Benchmarkcited by 158
  11. 2017A Review on Deep Learning Techniques Applied to Semantic Segmentationcited by 122
  12. 2017Deep Projective 3D Semantic Segmentationcited by 81
8 more
  1. 2018MeshCNN: A Network with an Edgecited by 69
  2. 2020DualConvMesh-Net: Joint Geodesic and Euclidean Convolutions on 3D Meshescited by 42
  3. 2019DublinCity: Annotated LiDAR Point Cloud and its Applicationscited by 31
  4. 2019Linking Points With Labels in 3D: A Review of Point Cloud Semantic Segmentationcited by 29
  5. 2019SynthCity: A large scale synthetic point cloudcited by 26
  6. 2019A review on deep learning techniques for 3D sensed data classificationcited by 18
  7. 2019LaplacianNet: Learning on 3D Meshes with Laplacian Encoding and Poolingcited by 5
  8. 2019Shooting Labels: 3D Semantic Labeling by Virtual Realitycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.