mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DeFiFusion: Combining Transaction Events with Smart Contracts to Detect Price Manipulation Attacks

arXiv 2609.11008 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2026cs.CR cs.AI cs.SEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has emerged as a rapidly growing blockchain-based financial service, where market transaction dynamics and underlying smart contract logic are intricately intertwined. This autonomous interplay, while eliminating centralized intermediaries, significantly expands the vulnerability surface of DeFi protocols to Price Manipulation Attacks (PMAs), which have already inflicted catastrophic financial losses. Despite their gravity, existing detection paradigms suffer from fundamental limitations. Transaction-centric methods lack awareness of contract execution semantics, making them prone to false positives under legitimate market volatility, while static contract analyses ignore real transaction behaviors and frequently report vulnerabilities that are infeasible to exploit in practice. We present DeFiFusion, a dual-modal PMA detection framework that closes this gap by jointly modeling transaction events and smart contract semantics within a unified pipeline. Our core insight is that PMA maliciousness emerges only from the interaction between transaction behaviors and the contract logic they exploit; neither signal suffices in isolation. Accordingly, we derive price-manipulation-aware event encoding for extracting fine-grained temporal and economic features tailored to manipulation patterns. We further introduce LLM-based contract semantic extraction to supply the execution-logic context that prior behavioral methods lack. To fuse these modalities, we propose a Dual-Modal Projection-Fusion Transformer with T5-style relative positional encoding, capturing the cyclic multi-stage execution structures that distinguish PMAs from benign market activity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DeFiFusion consistently achieves state-of-the-art detection performance, effectively recalling 222 of the 225 PMA cases while maintaining a precision of 96.10%.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.

Builds on

16 of 36 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
  4. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
  5. 2022SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Attackscited by 28
  6. 2021SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi)cited by 23
  7. 2019The Art of The Scam: Demystifying Honeypots in Ethereum Smart Contractscited by 13
  8. 2020High-Frequency Trading on Decentralized On-Chain Exchangescited by 10
  9. 2025Entropy-Guided Attention for Private LLMscited by 9
  10. 2021On the Just-In-Time Discovery of Profit-Generating Transactions in DeFi Protocolscited by 6
  11. 2022FlashSyn: Flash Loan Attack Synthesis via Counter Example Driven Approximationcited by 5
  12. 2021CeFi vs. DeFi -- Comparing Centralized to Decentralized Financecited by 4
4 more
  1. 2025Following Devils' Footprint: Towards Real-time Detection of Price Manipulation Attackscited by 4
  2. 2025Detecting Various DeFi Price Manipulations with LLM Reasoningcited by 4
  3. 2021BLOCKEYE: Hunting For DeFi Attacks on Blockchaincited by 2
  4. 2024DeFiGuard: A Price Manipulation Detection Service in DeFi using Graph Neural Networkscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.