mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sensing population distribution from satellite imagery via deep learning: model selection, neighboring effect, and systematic biases

arXiv 2103.02155 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2021cs.CV cs.LG eess.IVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid development of remote sensing techniques provides rich, large-coverage, and high-temporal information of the ground, which can be coupled with the emerging deep learning approaches that enable latent features and hidden geographical patterns to be extracted. This study marks the first attempt to cross-compare performances of popular state-of-the-art deep learning models in estimating population distribution from remote sensing images, investigate the contribution of neighboring effect, and explore the potential systematic population estimation biases. We conduct an end-to-end training of four popular deep learning architectures, i.e., VGG, ResNet, Xception, and DenseNet, by establishing a mapping between Sentinel-2 image patches and their corresponding population count from the LandScan population grid. The results reveal that DenseNet outperforms the other three models, while VGG has the worst performances in all evaluating metrics under all selected neighboring scenarios. As for the neighboring effect, contradicting existing studies, our results suggest that the increase of neighboring sizes leads to reduced population estimation performance, which is found universal for all four selected models in all evaluating metrics. In addition, there exists a notable, universal bias that all selected deep learning models tend to overestimate sparsely populated image patches and underestimate densely populated image patches, regardless of neighboring sizes. The methodological, experimental, and contextual knowledge this study provides is expected to benefit a wide range of future studies that estimate population distribution via remote sensing imagery.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2021.

Builds on

11 of 59 references.

References · 11

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  4. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  5. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  6. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
  7. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  8. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
  9. 2017Deep learning in remote sensing: a reviewcited by 128
  10. 2017A Deep Learning Approach for Population Estimation from Satellite Imagerycited by 15
  11. 2019Mapping Missing Population in Rural India: A Deep Learning Approach with Satellite Imagerycited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

7 papers.