mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Double Coverage with Machine-Learned Advice

arXiv 2103.01640 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2021cs.LG cs.DScited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the fundamental online k-server problem in a learning-augmented setting. While in the traditional online model, an algorithm has no information about the request sequence, we assume that there is given some advice (e.g. machine-learned predictions) on an algorithm's decision. There is, however, no guarantee on the quality of the prediction and it might be far from being correct. Our main result is a learning-augmented variation of the well-known Double Coverage algorithm for k-server on the line (Chrobak et al., SIDMA 1991) in which we integrate predictions as well as our trust into their quality. We give an error-dependent competitive ratio, which is a function of a user-defined confidence parameter, and which interpolates smoothly between an optimal consistency, the performance in case that all predictions are correct, and the best-possible robustness regardless of the prediction quality. When given good predictions, we improve upon known lower bounds for online algorithms without advice. We further show that our algorithm achieves for any k an almost optimal consistency-robustness tradeoff, within a class of deterministic algorithms respecting local and memoryless properties. Our algorithm outperforms a previously proposed (more general) learning-augmented algorithm. It is remarkable that the previous algorithm crucially exploits memory, whereas our algorithm is memoryless. Finally, we demonstrate in experiments the practicability and the superior performance of our algorithm on real-world data.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2021.

Builds on

26 of 58 references.

References · 26

  1. 2018Competitive caching with machine learned advicecited by 194
  2. 2017The Case for Learned Index Structurescited by 188
  3. 2020The Primal-Dual method for Learning Augmented Algorithmscited by 78
  4. 2020Online metric algorithms with untrusted predictionscited by 74
  5. 2019Near-Optimal Bounds for Online Caching with Machine Learned Advicecited by 73
  6. 2020Secretary and Online Matching Problems with Machine Learned Advicecited by 71
  7. 2019A Model for Learned Bloom Filters, and Optimizing by Sandwichingcited by 64
  8. 2020Optimal Robustness-Consistency Trade-offs for Learning-Augmented Online Algorithmscited by 64
  9. 2019Scheduling with Predictions and the Price of Mispredictioncited by 45
  10. 2019Online Computation with Untrusted Advicecited by 42
  11. 2019Learning-Based Low-Rank Approximationscited by 41
  12. 2020Secretaries with Advicecited by 41
14 more
  1. 2020Better and Simpler Learning-Augmented Online Cachingcited by 38
  2. 2020Learning Augmented Energy Minimization via Speed Scalingcited by 38
  3. 2020Online Algorithms for Weighted Paging with Predictionscited by 29
  4. 2020Learnable and Instance-Robust Predictions for Online Matching, Flows and Load Balancingcited by 27
  5. 2017Revenue Optimization with Approximate Bid Predictionscited by 21
  6. 2018Semi-Online Bipartite Matchingcited by 12
  7. 2020Online Search With a Hintcited by 7
  8. 2017k-server via multiscale entropic regularizationcited by 6
  9. 2020Generalized Sorting with Predictionscited by 5
  10. 2021Towards the k-server conjecture: A unifying potential, pushing the frontier to the circlecited by 3
  11. 2017Fusible HSTs and the randomized k-server conjecturecited by 2
  12. 2017A Collection of Lower Bounds for Online Matching on the Linecited by 1
  13. 2018The Online k-Taxi Problemcited by 1
  14. 2020Online k-Taxi via Double Coverage and Time-Reverse Primal-Dualcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

10 papers.