mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Cognitive network science for understanding online social cognitions: A brief review

arXiv 2102.12799 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2021cs.CY cs.CL cs.SIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Social media are digitalising massive amounts of users' cognitions in terms of timelines and emotional content. Such Big Data opens unprecedented opportunities for investigating cognitive phenomena like perception, personality and information diffusion but requires suitable interpretable frameworks. Since social media data come from users' minds, worthy candidates for this challenge are cognitive networks, models of cognition giving structure to mental conceptual associations. This work outlines how cognitive network science can open new, quantitative ways for understanding cognition through online media, like: (i) reconstructing how users semantically and emotionally frame events with contextual knowledge unavailable to machine learning, (ii) investigating conceptual salience/prominence through knowledge structure in social discourse; (iii) studying users' personality traits like openness-to-experience, curiosity, and creativity through language in posts; (iv) bridging cognitive/emotional content and social dynamics via multilayer networks comparing the mindsets of influencers and followers. These advancements combine cognitive-, network- and computer science to understand cognitive mechanisms in both digital and real-world settings but come with limitations concerning representativeness, individual variability and data integration. Such aspects are discussed along the ethical implications of manipulating socio-cognitive data. In the future, reading cognitions through networks and social media can expose cognitive biases amplified by online platforms and relevantly inform policy making, education and markets about massive, complex cognitive trends.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2021.

Builds on

18 of 81 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014The Rise of Social Botscited by 96
  2. 2020The COVID-19 Social Media Infodemiccited by 64
  3. 2014The structure and dynamics of multilayer networkscited by 51
  4. 2017The paradigm-shift of social spambots: Evidence, theories, and tools for the arms racecited by 49
  5. 2016Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebookcited by 27
  6. 2018Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systemscited by 26
  7. 2016Divergent discourse between protests and counter-protests: #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMattercited by 13
  8. 2019Anti dependency distance minimization in short sequences. A graph theoretic approachcited by 13
  9. 2016Multiplex lexical networks reveal patterns in early word acquisition in childrencited by 11
  10. 2020#lockdown: network-enhanced emotional profiling at the times of COVID-19cited by 10
  11. 2020Text-mining forma mentis networks reconstruct public perception of the STEM gender gap in social mediacited by 8
  12. 2020Revealing semantic and emotional structure of suicide notes with cognitive network sciencecited by 6
6 more
  1. 2020Analysing Twitter Semantic Networks: the case of 2018 Italian Electionscited by 6
  2. 2018Word sense induction using word embeddings and community detection in complex networkscited by 5
  3. 2020GEFF: Graph Embedding for Functional Fingerprintingcited by 4
  4. 2020Analysis of English free association network reveals mechanisms of efficient solution of Remote Association Testscited by 4
  5. 2013Structure-semantics interplay in complex networks and its effects on the predictability of similarity in textscited by 2
  6. 2020From Topic Networks to Distributed Cognitive Maps: Zipfian Topic Universes in the Area of Volunteered Geographic Informationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

5 papers.