Text-mining forma mentis networks reconstruct public perception of the STEM gender gap in social media
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Mindset reconstruction maps how individuals structure and perceive knowledge, a map unfolded here by investigating language and its cognitive reflection in the human mind, i.e. the mental lexicon. Textual forma mentis networks (TFMN) are glass boxes introduced for extracting, representing and understanding mindsets' structure, in Latin "forma mentis", from textual data. Combining network science, psycholinguistics and Big Data, TFMNs successfully identified relevant concepts, without supervision, in benchmark texts. Once validated, TFMNs were applied to the case study of the gender gap in science, which was strongly linked to distorted mindsets by recent studies. Focusing over social media perception and online discourse, this work analysed 10,000 relevant tweets. "Gender" and "gap" elicited a mostly positive perception, with a trustful/joyous emotional profile and semantic associates that: celebrated successful female scientists, related gender gap to wage differences, and hoped for a future resolution. The perception of "woman" highlighted discussion about sexual harassment and stereotype threat (a form of implicit cognitive bias) relative to women in science "sacrificing personal skills for success". The reconstructed perception of "man" highlighted social users' awareness of the myth of male superiority in science. No anger was detected around "person", suggesting that gap-focused discourse got less tense around genderless terms. No stereotypical perception of "scientist" was identified online, differently from real-world surveys. The overall analysis identified the online discourse as promoting a mostly stereotype-free, positive/trustful perception of gender disparity, aware of implicit/explicit biases and projected to closing the gap. TFMNs opened new ways for investigating perceptions in different groups, offering detailed data-informed grounding for policy making.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2021PyPlutchik: visualising and comparing emotion-annotated corporacited by 6
- 2021DASentimental: Detecting depression, anxiety and stress in texts via emotional recall, cognitive networks and machine learningcited by 6
- 2021Cognitive network science for understanding online social cognitions: A brief reviewcited by 5
- 2021Cognitive networks identify the content of English and Italian popular posts about COVID-19 vaccines: Anticipation, logistics, conspiracy and loss of trustcited by 2
- 2021Cognitive network science quantifies feelings expressed in suicide letters and Reddit mental health communitiescited by 2
- 2026Mapping how LLMs debate societal issues when shadowing human personality traits, sociodemographics and social media behaviorcited by 2
- 2024From Perils to Possibilities: Understanding how Human (and AI) Biases affect Online Foracited by 1
- 2026Natural Language Processing Psychometricscited by 0
- 2026Natural Language Processing Psychometrics7 Aug 2026
- 2026Mapping how LLMs debate societal issues when shadowing human personality traits, sociodemographics and social media behavior30 Apr 2026
- 2024From Perils to Possibilities: Understanding how Human (and AI) Biases affect Online Fora21 Mar 2024
- 2021Cognitive network science quantifies feelings expressed in suicide letters and Reddit mental health communities28 Oct 2021
- 2021DASentimental: Detecting depression, anxiety and stress in texts via emotional recall, cognitive networks and machine learning26 Oct 2021
- 2021PyPlutchik: visualising and comparing emotion-annotated corpora19 Apr 2021
- 2021Cognitive networks identify the content of English and Italian popular posts about COVID-19 vaccines: Anticipation, logistics, conspiracy and loss of trust29 Mar 2021
- 2021Cognitive network science for understanding online social cognitions: A brief review25 Feb 2021