mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mixed Variable Bayesian Optimization with Frequency Modulated Kernels

arXiv 2102.12792 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2021stat.ML cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The sample efficiency of Bayesian optimization(BO) is often boosted by Gaussian Process(GP) surrogate models. However, on mixed variable spaces, surrogate models other than GPs are prevalent, mainly due to the lack of kernels which can model complex dependencies across different types of variables. In this paper, we propose the frequency modulated (FM) kernel flexibly modeling dependencies among different types of variables, so that BO can enjoy the further improved sample efficiency. The FM kernel uses distances on continuous variables to modulate the graph Fourier spectrum derived from discrete variables. However, the frequency modulation does not always define a kernel with the similarity measure behavior which returns higher values for pairs of more similar points. Therefore, we specify and prove conditions for FM kernels to be positive definite and to exhibit the similarity measure behavior. In experiments, we demonstrate the improved sample efficiency of GP BO using FM kernels (BO-FM).On synthetic problems and hyperparameter optimization problems, BO-FM outperforms competitors consistently. Also, the importance of the frequency modulation principle is empirically demonstrated on the same problems. On joint optimization of neural architectures and SGD hyperparameters, BO-FM outperforms competitors including Regularized evolution(RE) and BOHB. Remarkably, BO-FM performs better even than RE and BOHB using three times as many evaluations.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2021.

Builds on

24 of 49 references.

References · 24

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  3. 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,782
  4. 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,489
  5. 2018Regularized Evolution for Image Classifier Architecture Searchcited by 902
  6. 2018Efficient Neural Architecture Search via Parameter Sharingcited by 831
  7. 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 688
  8. 2018BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scalecited by 466
  9. 2017Graph Signal Processing: Overview, Challenges and Applicationscited by 409
  10. 2018Neural Architecture Search with Bayesian Optimisation and Optimal Transportcited by 192
  11. 2015Kernel Interpolation for Scalable Structured Gaussian Processes (KISS-GP)cited by 175
  12. 2020NATS-Bench: Benchmarking NAS Algorithms for Architecture Topology and Sizecited by 98
12 more
  1. 2019Combinatorial Bayesian Optimization using the Graph Cartesian Productcited by 78
  2. 2019ChemBO: Bayesian Optimization of Small Organic Molecules with Synthesizable Recommendationscited by 77
  3. 2019One-Shot Neural Architecture Search via Self-Evaluated Template Networkcited by 69
  4. 2018Bayesian Optimization of Combinatorial Structurescited by 64
  5. 2018BOCK : Bayesian Optimization with Cylindrical Kernelscited by 62
  6. 2018Bayesian Optimization in AlphaGocited by 55
  7. 2019Bayesian Optimisation over Multiple Continuous and Categorical Inputscited by 55
  8. 2017Non-Stationary Spectral Kernelscited by 38
  9. 2019Mixed-Variable Bayesian Optimizationcited by 29
  10. 2019Bayesian Optimization for Categorical and Category-Specific Continuous Inputscited by 28
  11. 2019Safe Contextual Bayesian Optimization for Sustainable Room Temperature PID Control Tuningcited by 24
  12. 2015Generalized Spectral Kernelscited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

4 papers.