mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hyperspectral Denoising Using Unsupervised Disentangled Spatio-Spectral Deep Priors

arXiv 2102.12310 ↗First posted 24 Feb 2021eess.IV cs.CVcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Image denoising is often empowered by accurate prior information. In recent years, data-driven neural network priors have shown promising performance for RGB natural image denoising. Compared to classic handcrafted priors (e.g., sparsity and total variation), the "deep priors" are learned using a large number of training samples -- which can accurately model the complex image generating process. However, data-driven priors are hard to acquire for hyperspectral images (HSIs) due to the lack of training data. A remedy is to use the so-called unsupervised deep image prior (DIP). Under the unsupervised DIP framework, it is hypothesized and empirically demonstrated that proper neural network structures are reasonable priors of certain types of images, and the network weights can be learned without training data. Nonetheless, the most effective unsupervised DIP structures were proposed for natural images instead of HSIs. The performance of unsupervised DIP-based HSI denoising is limited by a couple of serious challenges, namely, network structure design and network complexity. This work puts forth an unsupervised DIP framework that is based on the classic spatio-spectral decomposition of HSIs. Utilizing the so-called linear mixture model of HSIs, two types of unsupervised DIPs, i.e., U-Net-like network and fully-connected networks, are employed to model the abundance maps and endmembers contained in the HSIs, respectively. This way, empirically validated unsupervised DIP structures for natural images can be easily incorporated for HSI denoising. Besides, the decomposition also substantially reduces network complexity. An efficient alternating optimization algorithm is proposed to handle the formulated denoising problem. Semi-real and real data experiments are employed to showcase the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2021.

Builds on

18 of 61 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  4. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  5. 2017Deep Image Priorcited by 1,097
  6. 2016Tensor Decomposition for Signal Processing and Machine Learningcited by 223
  7. 2018Image Restoration using Total Variation Regularized Deep Image Priorcited by 65
  8. 2017Hyperspectral Image Restoration via Total Variation Regularized Low-rank Tensor Decompositioncited by 61
  9. 2017A Multi-Scale and Multi-Depth Convolutional Neural Network for Remote Sensing Imagery Pan-Sharpeningcited by 54
  10. 2018Hyperspectral Image Denoising Employing a Spatial-Spectral Deep Residual Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 51
  11. 2019Deep Hyperspectral Prior: Denoising, Inpainting, Super-Resolutioncited by 36
  12. 2017Weighted Low-rank Tensor Recovery for Hyperspectral Image Restorationcited by 30
6 more
  1. 2018Hyperspectral Super-Resolution: A Coupled Tensor Factorization Approachcited by 24
  2. 2017Denoising Hyperspectral Image with Non-i.i.d. Noise Structurecited by 23
  3. 2018Hybrid Noise Removal in Hyperspectral Imagery With a Spatial-Spectral Gradient Networkcited by 14
  4. 2015Semiblind Hyperspectral Unmixing in the Presence of Spectral Library Mismatchescited by 13
  5. 2014Self-Dictionary Sparse Regression for Hyperspectral Unmixing: Greedy Pursuit and Pure Pixel Search are Relatedcited by 10
  6. 2016Inexact Block Coordinate Descent Methods For Symmetric Nonnegative Matrix Factorizationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

12 papers.