mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Gifsplanation via Latent Shift: A Simple Autoencoder Approach to Counterfactual Generation for Chest X-rays

arXiv 2102.09475 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2021cs.CV cs.AI eess.IVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Motivation: Traditional image attribution methods struggle to satisfactorily explain predictions of neural networks. Prediction explanation is important, especially in medical imaging, for avoiding the unintended consequences of deploying AI systems when false positive predictions can impact patient care. Thus, there is a pressing need to develop improved models for model explainability and introspection. Specific problem: A new approach is to transform input images to increase or decrease features which cause the prediction. However, current approaches are difficult to implement as they are monolithic or rely on GANs. These hurdles prevent wide adoption. Our approach: Given an arbitrary classifier, we propose a simple autoencoder and gradient update (Latent Shift) that can transform the latent representation of a specific input image to exaggerate or curtail the features used for prediction. We use this method to study chest X-ray classifiers and evaluate their performance. We conduct a reader study with two radiologists assessing 240 chest X-ray predictions to identify which ones are false positives (half are) using traditional attribution maps or our proposed method. Results: We found low overlap with ground truth pathology masks for models with reasonably high accuracy. However, the results from our reader study indicate that these models are generally looking at the correct features. We also found that the Latent Shift explanation allows a user to have more confidence in true positive predictions compared to traditional approaches (0.15±0.95 in a 5 point scale with p=0.01) with only a small increase in false positive predictions (0.04±1.06 with p=0.57). Accompanying webpage: https://mlmed.org/gifsplanation Source code: https://github.com/mlmed/gifsplanation

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2021.

Builds on

21 of 35 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  3. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  4. 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
  5. 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,410
  6. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  7. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  8. 2017ChestX-ray8: Hospital-scale Chest X-ray Database and Benchmarks on Weakly-Supervised Classification and Localization of Common Thorax Diseasescited by 969
  9. 2019MIMIC-CXR-JPG, a large publicly available database of labeled chest radiographscited by 590
  10. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 542
  11. 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 374
  12. 2019PadChest: A large chest x-ray image dataset with multi-label annotated reportscited by 308
9 more
  1. 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 293
  2. 2018Distribution Matching Losses Can Hallucinate Features in Medical Image Translationcited by 99
  3. 2019Explanation by Progressive Exaggerationcited by 76
  4. 2020On the limits of cross-domain generalization in automated X-ray predictioncited by 61
  5. 2020Weakly Supervised Lesion Localization With Probabilistic-CAM Poolingcited by 35
  6. 2021Using StyleGAN for Visual Interpretability of Deep Learning Models on Medical Imagescited by 35
  7. 2020Assessing the (Un)Trustworthiness of Saliency Maps for Localizing Abnormalities in Medical Imagingcited by 32
  8. 2018xGEMs: Generating Examplars to Explain Black-Box Modelscited by 21
  9. 2020Assessing the validity of saliency maps for abnormality localization in medical imagingcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1.

2 papers.