mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Topological Obstructions to Autoencoding

arXiv 2102.08380 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2021hep-ph cs.LG stat.MLcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Autoencoders have been proposed as a powerful tool for model-independent anomaly detection in high-energy physics. The operating principle is that events which do not belong to the space of training data will be reconstructed poorly, thus flagging them as anomalies. We point out that in a variety of examples of interest, the connection between large reconstruction error and anomalies is not so clear. In particular, for data sets with nontrivial topology, there will always be points that erroneously seem anomalous due to global issues. Conversely, neural networks typically have an inductive bias or prior to locally interpolate such that undersampled or rare events may be reconstructed with small error, despite actually being the desired anomalies. Taken together, these facts are in tension with the simple picture of the autoencoder as an anomaly detector. Using a series of illustrative low-dimensional examples, we show explicitly how the intrinsic and extrinsic topology of the dataset affects the behavior of an autoencoder and how this topology is manifested in the latent space representation during training. We ground this analysis in the discussion of a mock "bump hunt" in which the autoencoder fails to identify an anomalous "signal" for reasons tied to the intrinsic topology of n-particle phase space.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2021.

Builds on

26 of 81 references.

References · 26

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  3. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  4. 2018Spherical CNNscited by 452
  5. 2017Don't Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Sizecited by 313
  6. 2018Clebsch-Gordan Nets: a Fully Fourier Space Spherical Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 168
  7. 2019Topological Autoencoderscited by 124
  8. 2020Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theorycited by 102
  9. 2018Energy Flow Networks: Deep Sets for Particle Jetscited by 83
  10. 2020Sampling using SU(N) gauge equivariant flowscited by 83
  11. 2021A Living Review of Machine Learning for Particle Physicscited by 77
  12. 2020A Neural Scaling Law from the Dimension of the Data Manifoldcited by 48
14 more
  1. 2015Jet-Images -- Deep Learning Editioncited by 41
  2. 2018Variational Autoencoders for New Physics Mining at the Large Hadron Collidercited by 40
  3. 2020Variational Autoencoders for Anomalous Jet Taggingcited by 33
  4. 2017QCD-Aware Recursive Neural Networks for Jet Physicscited by 22
  5. 2016Deep learning in color: towards automated quark/gluon jet discriminationcited by 21
  6. 2018Novelty Detection Meets Collider Physicscited by 20
  7. 2020Linearized Optimal Transport for Collider Eventscited by 16
  8. 2017Jet Constituents for Deep Neural Network Based Top Quark Taggingcited by 15
  9. 2017Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks with jet constituents for boosted top tagging at the LHCcited by 13
  10. 2017Recursive Neural Networks in Quark/Gluon Taggingcited by 10
  11. 2018Autoencoding topologycited by 7
  12. 2018Jet Charge and Machine Learningcited by 5
  13. 2017Deep Neural Networks for Physics Analysis on low-level whole-detector data at the LHCcited by 3
  14. 2018Opening the black box of neural nets: case studies in stop/top discriminationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 0; 2023: 8; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Machine Learning in the Search for New Fundamental Physicscited by 50
  2. 2021Autoencoders for unsupervised anomaly detection in high energy physicscited by 32
  3. 2023Learning Topology-Preserving Data Representationscited by 30
  4. 2023Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection in Particle Physicscited by 29
  5. 2021The Dark Machines Anomaly Score Challenge: Benchmark Data and Model Independent Event Classification for the Large Hadron Collidercited by 28
  6. 2021Better Latent Spaces for Better Autoencoderscited by 20
  7. 2021Challenges for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Particle Physicscited by 16
  8. 2021Online-compatible Unsupervised Non-resonant Anomaly Detectioncited by 15
  9. 2021Comparing Weak- and Unsupervised Methods for Resonant Anomaly Detectioncited by 13
  10. 2023Improving new physics searches with diffusion models for event observables and jet constituentscited by 10
  11. 2023ELSA -- Enhanced latent spaces for improved collider simulationscited by 5
  12. 2023Topological Obstructions and How to Avoid Themcited by 4
8 more
  1. 2023Why should autoencoders work?cited by 3
  2. 2023Dynamical transition in controllable quantum neural networks with large depthcited by 2
  3. 2023Improving the performance of weak supervision searches using transfer and meta-learningcited by 2
  4. 2025TRANSIT your events into a new mass: Fast background interpolation for weakly-supervised anomaly searchescited by 0
  5. 2025Autoencoding Dynamics: Topological Limitations and Capabilitiescited by 0
  6. 2026Geometry-Preserving Neural Architectures on Manifolds with Boundarycited by 0
  7. 2026Generative models on phase spacecited by 0
  8. 2026Contrastive Learning for Interpretable Anomaly Detection at Collider Experimentscited by 0