mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Challenges for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Particle Physics

arXiv 2110.06948 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2021hep-ph cs.LG hep-excited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Anomaly detection relies on designing a score to determine whether a particular event is uncharacteristic of a given background distribution. One way to define a score is to use autoencoders, which rely on the ability to reconstruct certain types of data (background) but not others (signals). In this paper, we study some challenges associated with variational autoencoders, such as the dependence on hyperparameters and the metric used, in the context of anomalous signal (top and W) jets in a QCD background. We find that the hyperparameter choices strongly affect the network performance and that the optimal parameters for one signal are non-optimal for another. In exploring the networks, we uncover a connection between the latent space of a variational autoencoder trained using mean-squared-error and the optimal transport distances within the dataset. We then show that optimal transport distances to representative events in the background dataset can be used directly for anomaly detection, with performance comparable to the autoencoders. Whether using autoencoders or optimal transport distances for anomaly detection, we find that the choices that best represent the background are not necessarily best for signal identification. These challenges with unsupervised anomaly detection bolster the case for additional exploration of semi-supervised or alternative approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2021.

Builds on

31 of 94 references.

References · 31

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
  4. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,472
  5. 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,070
  6. 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 1,000
  7. 2016Improving Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive Flowcited by 640
  8. 2018Sylvester Normalizing Flows for Variational Inferencecited by 72
  9. 2020Anomaly Detection with Density Estimationcited by 72
  10. 2020Anomaly Detection With Conditional Variational Autoencoderscited by 46
  11. 2018Variational Autoencoders for New Physics Mining at the Large Hadron Collidercited by 41
  12. 2020Variational Autoencoders for Anomalous Jet Taggingcited by 33
19 more
  1. 2021Autoencoders for unsupervised anomaly detection in high energy physicscited by 32
  2. 2021The Dark Machines Anomaly Score Challenge: Benchmark Data and Model Independent Event Classification for the Large Hadron Collidercited by 29
  3. 2020Simulation Assisted Likelihood-free Anomaly Detectioncited by 27
  4. 2017Weakly Supervised Classification in High Energy Physicscited by 21
  5. 2021Better Latent Spaces for Better Autoencoderscited by 21
  6. 2018Novelty Detection Meets Collider Physicscited by 20
  7. 2021Topological Obstructions to Autoencodingcited by 20
  8. 2021Bump Hunting in Latent Spacecited by 19
  9. 2020Adversarially Learned Anomaly Detection on CMS Open Data: re-discovering the top quarkcited by 18
  10. 2020Linearized Optimal Transport for Collider Eventscited by 16
  11. 2020Variational Autoencoders for Jet Simulationcited by 14
  12. 2020Simulation-Assisted Decorrelation for Resonant Anomaly Detectioncited by 13
  13. 2021Comparing Weak- and Unsupervised Methods for Resonant Anomaly Detectioncited by 13
  14. 2020Unsupervised in-distribution anomaly detection of new physics through conditional density estimationcited by 12
  15. 2019Lund jet images from generative and cycle-consistent adversarial networkscited by 11
  16. 2020Anomaly Awarenesscited by 10
  17. 2018Learning to Classify from Impure Samples with High-Dimensional Datacited by 8
  18. 2021An Exploration of Learnt Representations of W Jetscited by 8
  19. 2017(Machine) Learning to Do More with Lesscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 6; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: