mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sparse Coding and Autoencoders

arXiv 1708.03735 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2017cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In "Dictionary Learning" one tries to recover incoherent matrices A^* ∈ ℝn × h (typically overcomplete and whose columns are assumed to be normalized) and sparse vectors x^* ∈ ℝh with a small support of size hp for some 0 <p < 1 while having access to observations y ∈ ℝn where y = A^*x^*. In this work we undertake a rigorous analysis of whether gradient descent on the squared loss of an autoencoder can solve the dictionary learning problem. The "Autoencoder" architecture we consider is a ℝn rightarrow ℝn mapping with a single ReLU activation layer of size h. Under very mild distributional assumptions on x^*, we prove that the norm of the expected gradient of the standard squared loss function is asymptotically (in sparse code dimension) negligible for all points in a small neighborhood of A^*. This is supported with experimental evidence using synthetic data. We also conduct experiments to suggest that A^* is a local minimum. Along the way we prove that a layer of ReLU gates can be set up to automatically recover the support of the sparse codes. This property holds independent of the loss function. We believe that it could be of independent interest.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

11 papers.