mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient Competitions and Online Learning with Strategic Forecasters

arXiv 2102.08358 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2021cs.LG cs.GTcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Winner-take-all competitions in forecasting and machine-learning suffer from distorted incentives. Witkowski et al. 2018 identified this problem and proposed ELF, a truthful mechanism to select a winner. We show that, from a pool of n forecasters, ELF requires Theta(nlog n) events or test data points to select a near-optimal forecaster with high probability. We then show that standard online learning algorithms select an ε-optimal forecaster using only O(log(n) / ε2) events, by way of a strong approximate-truthfulness guarantee. This bound matches the best possible even in the nonstrategic setting. We then apply these mechanisms to obtain the first no-regret guarantee for non-myopic strategic experts.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2021.

Builds on

7 of 28 references.

References · 7

  1. 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
  2. 2015Fighting Bandits with a New Kind of Smoothnesscited by 45
  3. 2020No-Regret and Incentive-Compatible Online Learningcited by 14
  4. 2017Online Prediction with Selfish Expertscited by 10
  5. 2021Incentive-Compatible Forecasting Competitionscited by 9
  6. 2017Online Learning via the Differential Privacy Lenscited by 8
  7. 2018Constant Regret, Generalized Mixability, and Mirror Descentcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.

9 papers.