Efficient Competitions and Online Learning with Strategic Forecasters
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Winner-take-all competitions in forecasting and machine-learning suffer from distorted incentives. Witkowski et al. 2018 identified this problem and proposed ELF, a truthful mechanism to select a winner. We show that, from a pool of n forecasters, ELF requires Theta(nlog n) events or test data points to select a near-optimal forecaster with high probability. We then show that standard online learning algorithms select an ε-optimal forecaster using only O(log(n) / ε2) events, by way of a strong approximate-truthfulness guarantee. This bound matches the best possible even in the nonstrategic setting. We then apply these mechanisms to obtain the first no-regret guarantee for non-myopic strategic experts.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2021.
Builds on
7 of 28 references.
References · 7
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
- 2015Fighting Bandits with a New Kind of Smoothnesscited by 45
- 2020No-Regret and Incentive-Compatible Online Learningcited by 14
- 2017Online Prediction with Selfish Expertscited by 10
- 2021Incentive-Compatible Forecasting Competitionscited by 9
- 2017Online Learning via the Differential Privacy Lenscited by 8
- 2018Constant Regret, Generalized Mixability, and Mirror Descentcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.
9 papers.
- 2024Online Learning from Strategic Human Feedback in LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 10
- 2022Scoring Rules for Performative Binary Predictioncited by 3
- 2022Sample Complexity of Forecast Aggregationcited by 0
- 2023Forecasting Competitions with Correlated Eventscited by 0
- 2023No-Regret Online Prediction with Strategic Expertscited by 0
- 2024On the price of exact truthfulness in incentive-compatible online learning with bandit feedback: A regret lower bound for WSU-UXcited by 0
- 2024Hedging and Approximate Truthfulness in Traditional Forecasting Competitionscited by 0
- 2025No-regret incentive-compatible online learning under exact truthfulness with non-myopic expertscited by 0
- 2025WOMAC: A Mechanism For Prediction Competitionscited by 0
- 2025WOMAC: A Mechanism For Prediction Competitions25 Aug 2025
- 2025No-regret incentive-compatible online learning under exact truthfulness with non-myopic experts17 Feb 2025
- 2024Online Learning from Strategic Human Feedback in LLM Fine-Tuning22 Dec 2024
- 2024Hedging and Approximate Truthfulness in Traditional Forecasting Competitions28 Sep 2024
- 2024On the price of exact truthfulness in incentive-compatible online learning with bandit feedback: A regret lower bound for WSU-UX8 Apr 2024
- 2023No-Regret Online Prediction with Strategic Experts24 May 2023
- 2023Forecasting Competitions with Correlated Events24 Mar 2023
- 2022Sample Complexity of Forecast Aggregation26 Jul 2022
- 2022Scoring Rules for Performative Binary Prediction5 Jul 2022