Online Prediction with Selfish Experts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the problem of binary prediction with expert advice in settings where experts have agency and seek to maximize their credibility. This paper makes three main contributions. First, it defines a model to reason formally about settings with selfish experts, and demonstrates that "incentive compatible" (IC) algorithms are closely related to the design of proper scoring rules. Designing a good IC algorithm is easy if the designer's loss function is quadratic, but for other loss functions, novel techniques are required. Second, we design IC algorithms with good performance guarantees for the absolute loss function. Third, we give a formal separation between the power of online prediction with selfish experts and online prediction with honest experts by proving lower bounds for both IC and non-IC algorithms. In particular, with selfish experts and the absolute loss function, there is no (randomized) algorithm for online prediction-IC or otherwise-with asymptotically vanishing regret.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2021Information Discrepancy in Strategic Learningcited by 48
- 2024Online Learning from Strategic Human Feedback in LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 10
- 2021Efficient Competitions and Online Learning with Strategic Forecasterscited by 9
- 2022Scoring Rules for Performative Binary Predictioncited by 3
- 2023Trading-Off Payments and Accuracy in Online Classification with Paid Stochastic Expertscited by 3
- 2025The Battling Influencers Game: Nash Equilibria Structure of a Potential Game and Implications to Value Alignmentcited by 1
- 2023No-Regret Online Prediction with Strategic Expertscited by 0
- 2024On the price of exact truthfulness in incentive-compatible online learning with bandit feedback: A regret lower bound for WSU-UXcited by 0
- 2025No-regret incentive-compatible online learning under exact truthfulness with non-myopic expertscited by 0
- 2026Truthful Online Preference Aggregation for LLM Fine-Tuning in Mobile Crowdsourcingcited by 0
- 2026Truthful Online Preference Aggregation for LLM Fine-Tuning in Mobile Crowdsourcing22 May 2026
- 2025No-regret incentive-compatible online learning under exact truthfulness with non-myopic experts17 Feb 2025
- 2025The Battling Influencers Game: Nash Equilibria Structure of a Potential Game and Implications to Value Alignment3 Feb 2025
- 2024Online Learning from Strategic Human Feedback in LLM Fine-Tuning22 Dec 2024
- 2024On the price of exact truthfulness in incentive-compatible online learning with bandit feedback: A regret lower bound for WSU-UX8 Apr 2024
- 2023Trading-Off Payments and Accuracy in Online Classification with Paid Stochastic Experts3 Jul 2023
- 2023No-Regret Online Prediction with Strategic Experts24 May 2023
- 2022Scoring Rules for Performative Binary Prediction5 Jul 2022
- 2021Information Discrepancy in Strategic Learning1 Mar 2021
- 2021Efficient Competitions and Online Learning with Strategic Forecasters16 Feb 2021