White-Box Performance-Influence Models: A Profiling and Learning Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many modern software systems are highly configurable, allowing the user to tune them for performance and more. Current performance modeling approaches aim at finding performance-optimal configurations by building performance models in a black-box manner. While these models provide accurate estimates, they cannot pinpoint causes of observed performance behavior to specific code regions. This does not only hinder system understanding, but it also complicates tracing the influence of configuration options to individual methods. We propose a white-box approach that models configuration-dependent performance behavior at the method level. This allows us to predict the influence of configuration decisions on individual methods, supporting system understanding and performance debugging. The approach consists of two steps: First, we use a coarse-grained profiler and learn performance-influence models for all methods, potentially identifying some methods that are highly configuration- and performance-sensitive, causing inaccurate predictions. Second, we re-measure these methods with a fine-grained profiler and learn more accurate models, at higher cost, though. By means of 9 real-world Java software systems, we demonstrate that our approach can efficiently identify configuration-relevant methods and learn accurate performance-influence models.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2023Predicting Software Performance with Divide-and-Learncited by 16
- 2025Distilled Lifelong Self-Adaptation for Configurable Systemscited by 11
- 2025Dually Hierarchical Drift Adaptation for Online Configuration Performance Learningcited by 7
- 2023CaRE: Finding Root Causes of Configuration Issues in Highly-Configurable Robotscited by 4
- 2024Dividable Configuration Performance Learningcited by 4
- 2026Revealing Domain-Spatiality Patterns for Configuration Tuning: Domain Knowledge Meets Fitness Landscapescited by 4
- 2024Rethinking Performance Analysis for Configurable Software Systems: A Case Study from a Fitness Landscape Perspectivecited by 3
- 2022Uncertainty-Aware Performance Prediction for Highly Configurable Software Systems via Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2025Hardness, Structural Knowledge, and Opportunity: An Analytical Framework for Modular Performance Modelingcited by 0
- 2026Revealing Domain-Spatiality Patterns for Configuration Tuning: Domain Knowledge Meets Fitness Landscapes20 Mar 2026
- 2025Hardness, Structural Knowledge, and Opportunity: An Analytical Framework for Modular Performance Modeling13 Sep 2025
- 2025Dually Hierarchical Drift Adaptation for Online Configuration Performance Learning11 Jul 2025
- 2025Distilled Lifelong Self-Adaptation for Configurable Systems1 Jan 2025
- 2024Rethinking Performance Analysis for Configurable Software Systems: A Case Study from a Fitness Landscape Perspective22 Dec 2024
- 2024Dividable Configuration Performance Learning11 Sep 2024
- 2023Predicting Software Performance with Divide-and-Learn11 Jun 2023
- 2023CaRE: Finding Root Causes of Configuration Issues in Highly-Configurable Robots18 Jan 2023
- 2022Uncertainty-Aware Performance Prediction for Highly Configurable Software Systems via Bayesian Neural Networks27 Dec 2022