mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CaRE: Finding Root Causes of Configuration Issues in Highly-Configurable Robots

arXiv 2301.07690 ↗First posted 18 Jan 2023cs.RO cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Robotic systems have subsystems with a combinatorially large configuration space and hundreds or thousands of possible software and hardware configuration options interacting non-trivially. The configurable parameters are set to target specific objectives, but they can cause functional faults when incorrectly configured. Finding the root cause of such faults is challenging due to the exponentially large configuration space and the dependencies between the robot's configuration settings and performance. This paper proposes CaRE -- a method for diagnosing the root cause of functional faults through the lens of causality. CaRE abstracts the causal relationships between various configuration options and the robot's performance objectives by learning a causal structure and estimating the causal effects of options on robot performance indicators. We demonstrate CaRE's efficacy by finding the root cause of the observed functional faults and validating the diagnosed root cause by conducting experiments in both physical robots (Husky and Turtlebot 3) and in simulation (Gazebo). Furthermore, we demonstrate that the causal models learned from robots in simulation (e.g., Husky in Gazebo) are transferable to physical robots across different platforms (e.g., Husky and Turtlebot 3).

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2023.

Builds on

19 of 76 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalnesscited by 220
  2. 2018Robot Learning in Homes: Improving Generalization and Reducing Dataset Biascited by 75
  3. 2019Differentiable Gaussian Process Motion Planningcited by 27
  4. 2020MAPPER: Multi-Agent Path Planning with Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning in Mixed Dynamic Environmentscited by 26
  5. 2018Causal Testing: Finding Defects' Root Causescited by 22
  6. 2023Do Performance Aspirations Matter for Guiding Software Configuration Tuning?cited by 21
  7. 2017Transfer Learning for Performance Modeling of Configurable Systems: An Exploratory Analysiscited by 20
  8. 2022DriveFuzz: Discovering Autonomous Driving Bugs through Driving Quality-Guided Fuzzingcited by 19
  9. 2020APPLI: Adaptive Planner Parameter Learning From Interventionscited by 16
  10. 2021APPL: Adaptive Planner Parameter Learningcited by 15
  11. 2019Learning Software Configuration Spaces: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 14
  12. 2021AutoMate: A Dataset and Learning Approach for Automatic Mating of CAD Assembliescited by 13
7 more
  1. 2022Causality in Configurable Software Systemscited by 13
  2. 2021Understanding Performance Problems in Deep Learning Systemscited by 12
  3. 2022Unicorn: Reasoning about Configurable System Performance through the lens of Causalitycited by 12
  4. 2021White-Box Performance-Influence Models: A Profiling and Learning Approachcited by 9
  5. 2021Improving Fault Localization by Integrating Value and Predicate Based Causal Inference Techniquescited by 8
  6. 2022On Debugging the Performance of Configurable Software Systems: Developer Needs and Tailored Tool Supportcited by 6
  7. 2019Transfer Learning for Performance Modeling of Configurable Systems: A Causal Analysiscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.