mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Rethinking Performance Analysis for Configurable Software Systems: A Case Study from a Fitness Landscape Perspective

arXiv 2412.16888 ↗First posted 22 Dec 2024cs.PF cs.DC cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern software systems are often highly configurable to tailor varied requirements from diverse stakeholders. Understanding the mapping between configurations and the desired performance attributes plays a fundamental role in advancing the controllability and tuning of the underlying system, yet has long been a dark hole of knowledge due to its black-box nature. While there have been previous efforts in performance analysis for these systems, they analyze the configurations as isolated data points without considering their inherent spatial relationships. This renders them incapable of interrogating many important aspects of the configuration space like local optima. In this work, we advocate a novel perspective to rethink performance analysis -- modeling the configuration space as a structured ``landscape''. To support this proposition, we designed our, an open-source, graph data mining empowered fitness landscape analysis (FLA) framework. By applying this framework to 86M benchmarked configurations from 32 running workloads of 3 real-world systems, we arrived at 6 main findings, which together constitute a holistic picture of the landscape topography, with thorough discussions about their implications on both configuration tuning and performance modeling.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 91 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2024.

Builds on

21 of 91 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,323
  2. 2023When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?cited by 218
  3. 2020Learning Search Space Partition for Black-box Optimization using Monte Carlo Tree Searchcited by 87
  4. 2017Learning to select data for transfer learning with Bayesian Optimizationcited by 64
  5. 2018Finding Faster Configurations using FLASHcited by 32
  6. 2021Multi-Objectivizing Software Configuration Tuning (for a single performance concern)cited by 27
  7. 2023Do Performance Aspirations Matter for Guiding Software Configuration Tuning?cited by 21
  8. 2017Transfer Learning for Performance Modeling of Configurable Systems: An Exploratory Analysiscited by 20
  9. 2023Improving Protein Optimization with Smoothed Fitness Landscapescited by 20
  10. 2024Predicting Configuration Performance in Multiple Environments with Sequential Meta-learningcited by 17
  11. 2019Meta-Surrogate Benchmarking for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 16
  12. 2017Transfer Learning for Improving Model Predictions in Highly Configurable Softwarecited by 12
9 more
  1. 2021White-Box Analysis over Machine Learning: Modeling Performance of Configurable Systemscited by 10
  2. 2022Does Configuration Encoding Matter in Learning Software Performance? An Empirical Study on Encoding Schemescited by 10
  3. 2021White-Box Performance-Influence Models: A Profiling and Learning Approachcited by 9
  4. 2017Using Bad Learners to find Good Configurationscited by 8
  5. 2017Faster Discovery of Faster System Configurations with Spectral Learningcited by 6
  6. 2022HINNPerf: Hierarchical Interaction Neural Network for Performance Prediction of Configurable Systemscited by 5
  7. 2023On the Hyperparameter Loss Landscapes of Machine Learning Models: An Exploratory Studycited by 4
  8. 2023Learning from Very Little Data: On the Value of Landscape Analysis for Predicting Software Project Healthcited by 3
  9. 2023Towards the Inferrence of Structural Similarity of Combinatorial Landscapescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.