mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Training Set Debugging Using Trusted Items

arXiv 1801.08019 ↗First posted 24 Jan 2018cs.LG stat.MLcited by 25

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training set bugs are flaws in the data that adversely affect machine learning. The training set is usually too large for man- ual inspection, but one may have the resources to verify a few trusted items. The set of trusted items may not by itself be adequate for learning, so we propose an algorithm that uses these items to identify bugs in the training set and thus im- proves learning. Specifically, our approach seeks the smallest set of changes to the training set labels such that the model learned from this corrected training set predicts labels of the trusted items correctly. We flag the items whose labels are changed as potential bugs, whose labels can be checked for veracity by human experts. To find the bugs in this way is a challenging combinatorial bilevel optimization problem, but it can be relaxed into a continuous optimization problem. Ex- periments on toy and real data demonstrate that our approach can identify training set bugs effectively and suggest appro- priate changes to the labels. Our algorithm is a step toward trustworthy machine learning.

Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 5; 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

25 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021De-Pois: An Attack-Agnostic Defense against Data Poisoning Attackscited by 33
  2. 2021Interpretable Data-Based Explanations for Fairness Debuggingcited by 30
  3. 2021Defense Against Reward Poisoning Attacks in Reinforcement Learningcited by 20
  4. 2023The Dataset Multiplicity Problem: How Unreliable Data Impacts Predictionscited by 17
  5. 2022Poisoning Attacks and Defenses on Artificial Intelligence: A Surveycited by 16
  6. 2021Iterative Teaching by Label Synthesiscited by 10
  7. 2023Data Cleaning and Machine Learning: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 9
  8. 2024Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Data Mining Perspectivecited by 9
  9. 2021Regularization Can Help Mitigate Poisoning Attacks... with the Right Hyperparameterscited by 8
  10. 2022Iterative Teaching by Data Hallucinationcited by 8
  11. 2022Consistent Range Approximation for Fair Predictive Modelingcited by 7
  12. 2023Non-Clashing Teaching Maps for Balls in Graphscited by 5
13 more
  1. 2022Certifying Data-Bias Robustness in Linear Regressioncited by 3
  2. 2023Hyperparameter Learning under Data Poisoning: Analysis of the Influence of Regularization via Multiobjective Bilevel Optimizationcited by 3
  3. 2021CHEF: A Cheap and Fast Pipeline for Iteratively Cleaning Label Uncertainties (Technical Report)cited by 2
  4. 2022New data poison attacks on machine learning classifiers for mobile exfiltrationcited by 2
  5. 2025The Computational Complexity of Positive Non-Clashing Teaching in Graphscited by 2
  6. 2021Defuse: Harnessing Unrestricted Adversarial Examples for Debugging Models Beyond Test Accuracycited by 1
  7. 2023DREAM: Debugging and Repairing AutoML Pipelinescited by 1
  8. 2024Manipulating Predictions over Discrete Inputs in Machine Teachingcited by 0
  9. 2024Learning from Uncertain Data: From Possible Worlds to Possible Modelscited by 0
  10. 2025A Comparative Analysis of Influence Signals for Data Debuggingcited by 0
  11. 2026Stealthy Poisoning Attacks Bypass Defenses in Regression Settingscited by 0
  12. 2026Non-Clashing Teaching in Graphs: Algorithms, Complexity, and Boundscited by 0
  13. 2026SAGE: Similarity-Based Cleaning of Poisoned Training Data from Verified Examplescited by 0