mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

STUaNet: Understanding uncertainty in spatiotemporal collective human mobility

arXiv 2102.06027 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2021cs.LG cs.NA math.NAcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The high dynamics and heterogeneous interactions in the complicated urban systems have raised the issue of uncertainty quantification in spatiotemporal human mobility, to support critical decision-makings in risk-aware web applications such as urban event prediction where fluctuations are of significant interests. Given the fact that uncertainty quantifies the potential variations around prediction results, traditional learning schemes always lack uncertainty labels, and conventional uncertainty quantification approaches mostly rely upon statistical estimations with Bayesian Neural Networks or ensemble methods. However, they have never involved any spatiotemporal evolution of uncertainties under various contexts, and also have kept suffering from the poor efficiency of statistical uncertainty estimation while training models with multiple times. To provide high-quality uncertainty quantification for spatiotemporal forecasting, we propose an uncertainty learning mechanism to simultaneously estimate internal data quality and quantify external uncertainty regarding various contextual interactions. To address the issue of lacking labels of uncertainty, we propose a hierarchical data turbulence scheme where we can actively inject controllable uncertainty for guidance, and hence provide insights to both uncertainty quantification and weak supervised learning. Finally, we re-calibrate and boost the prediction performance by devising a gated-based bridge to adaptively leverage the learned uncertainty into predictions. Extensive experiments on three real-world spatiotemporal mobility sets have corroborated the superiority of our proposed model in terms of both forecasting and uncertainty quantification.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2021.

Builds on

15 of 39 references.

References · 15

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  3. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  4. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  5. 2017Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Traffic Forecastingcited by 1,125
  6. 2016Deep Spatio-Temporal Residual Networks for Citywide Crowd Flows Predictioncited by 330
  7. 2018xDeepFM: Combining Explicit and Implicit Feature Interactions for Recommender Systemscited by 277
  8. 2017Concrete Dropoutcited by 227
  9. 2020SDE-Net: Equipping Deep Neural Networks with Uncertainty Estimatescited by 75
  10. 2019Sampling-free Epistemic Uncertainty Estimation Using Approximated Variance Propagationcited by 74
  11. 2019Learning from Multiple Cities: A Meta-Learning Approach for Spatial-Temporal Predictioncited by 64
  12. 2019STG2Seq: Spatial-temporal Graph to Sequence Model for Multi-step Passenger Demand Forecastingcited by 59
3 more
  1. 2017Bayesian Recurrent Neural Network Models for Forecasting and Quantifying Uncertainty in Spatial-Temporal Datacited by 17
  2. 2018Quantifying Uncertainty in Discrete-Continuous and Skewed Data with Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 13
  3. 2020Country Image in COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Chinacited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

11 papers.