Impact of Data Processing on Fairness in Supervised Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the impact of pre and post processing for reducing discrimination in data-driven decision makers. We first analyze the fundamental trade-off between fairness and accuracy in a pre-processing approach, and propose a design for a pre-processing module based on a convex optimization program, which can be added before the original classifier. This leads to a fundamental lower bound on attainable discrimination, given any acceptable distortion in the outcome. Furthermore, we reformulate an existing post-processing method in terms of our accuracy and fairness measures, which allows comparing post-processing and pre-processing approaches. We show that under some mild conditions, pre-processing outperforms post-processing. Finally, we show that by appropriate choice of the discrimination measure, the optimization problem for both pre and post processing approaches will reduce to a linear program and hence can be solved efficiently.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2021.
Builds on
14 of 36 references.
References · 14
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
- 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
- 2018FairGAN: Fairness-aware Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 164
- 2018Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable Guaranteescited by 146
- 2017From Parity to Preference-based Notions of Fairness in Classificationcited by 60
- 2019Repairing without Retraining: Avoiding Disparate Impact with Counterfactual Distributionscited by 48
- 2019Estimating Skin Tone and Effects on Classification Performance in Dermatology Datasetscited by 29
- 2018Fairness in Supervised Learning: An Information Theoretic Approachcited by 17
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022MEDFAIR: Benchmarking Fairness for Medical Imagingcited by 66
- 2022Survey on Fair Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Practicecited by 14
- 2023Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Societycited by 2
- 2022Ex-Ante Assessment of Discrimination in Datasetcited by 0
- 2024Beyond Algorithmic Fairness: A Guide to Develop and Deploy Ethical AI-Enabled Decision-Support Toolscited by 0
- 2024Beyond Algorithmic Fairness: A Guide to Develop and Deploy Ethical AI-Enabled Decision-Support Tools17 Sep 2024
- 2023Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society16 Apr 2023
- 2022MEDFAIR: Benchmarking Fairness for Medical Imaging4 Oct 2022
- 2022Ex-Ante Assessment of Discrimination in Dataset16 Aug 2022
- 2022Survey on Fair Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Practice20 May 2022