TAD: Trigger Approximation based Black-box Trojan Detection for AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
An emerging amount of intelligent applications have been developed with the surge of Machine Learning (ML). Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have demonstrated unprecedented performance across various fields such as medical diagnosis and autonomous driving. While DNNs are widely employed in security-sensitive fields, they are identified to be vulnerable to Neural Trojan (NT) attacks that are controlled and activated by the stealthy trigger. We call this vulnerable model adversarial artificial intelligence (AI). In this paper, we target to design a robust Trojan detection scheme that inspects whether a pre-trained AI model has been Trojaned before its deployment. Prior works are oblivious of the intrinsic property of trigger distribution and try to reconstruct the trigger pattern using simple heuristics, i.e., stimulating the given model to incorrect outputs. As a result, their detection time and effectiveness are limited. We leverage the observation that the pixel trigger typically features spatial dependency and propose TAD, the first trigger approximation based Trojan detection framework that enables fast and scalable search of the trigger in the input space. Furthermore, TAD can also detect Trojans embedded in the feature space where certain filter transformations are used to activate the Trojan. We perform extensive experiments to investigate the performance of the TAD across various datasets and ML models. Empirical results show that TAD achieves a ROC-AUC score of 0:91 on the public TrojAI dataset 1 and the average detection time per model is 7:1 minutes.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2021.
Builds on
8 of 16 references.
References · 8
- 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,052
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
- 2017Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attackscited by 288
- 2019TABOR: A Highly Accurate Approach to Inspecting and Restoring Trojan Backdoors in AI Systemscited by 120
- 2015DeepID3: Face Recognition with Very Deep Neural Networkscited by 62
- 2020The TrojAI Software Framework: An OpenSource tool for Embedding Trojans into Deep Learning Modelscited by 41
- 2020CLEANN: Accelerated Trojan Shield for Embedded Neural Networkscited by 22
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 2.
8 papers.
- 2022Wild Patterns Reloaded: A Survey of Machine Learning Security against Training Data Poisoningcited by 93
- 2023BEAGLE: Forensics of Deep Learning Backdoor Attack for Better Defensecited by 15
- 2021MISA: Online Defense of Trojaned Models using Misattributionscited by 4
- 2022PerD: Perturbation Sensitivity-based Neural Trojan Detection Framework on NLP Applicationscited by 3
- 2021FeSHI: Feature Map Based Stealthy Hardware Intrinsic Attackcited by 1
- 2022An Adaptive Black-box Backdoor Detection Method for Deep Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2023Mask and Restore: Blind Backdoor Defense at Test Time with Masked Autoencodercited by 1
- 2022Dormant Neural Trojanscited by 0
- 2023Mask and Restore: Blind Backdoor Defense at Test Time with Masked Autoencoder27 Mar 2023
- 2023BEAGLE: Forensics of Deep Learning Backdoor Attack for Better Defense16 Jan 2023
- 2022Dormant Neural Trojans2 Nov 2022
- 2022PerD: Perturbation Sensitivity-based Neural Trojan Detection Framework on NLP Applications8 Aug 2022
- 2022Wild Patterns Reloaded: A Survey of Machine Learning Security against Training Data Poisoning4 May 2022
- 2022An Adaptive Black-box Backdoor Detection Method for Deep Neural Networks8 Apr 2022
- 2021FeSHI: Feature Map Based Stealthy Hardware Intrinsic Attack13 Jun 2021
- 2021MISA: Online Defense of Trojaned Models using Misattributions29 Mar 2021