Bayesian Neural Networks for Virtual Flow Metering: An Empirical Study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent works have presented promising results from the application of machine learning (ML) to the modeling of flow rates in oil and gas wells. Encouraging results and advantageous properties of ML models, such as computationally cheap evaluation and ease of calibration to new data, have sparked optimism for the development of data-driven virtual flow meters (VFMs). Data-driven VFMs are developed in the small data regime, where it is important to question the uncertainty and robustness of models. The modeling of uncertainty may help to build trust in models, which is a prerequisite for industrial applications. The contribution of this paper is the introduction of a probabilistic VFM based on Bayesian neural networks. Uncertainty in the model and measurements is described, and the paper shows how to perform approximate Bayesian inference using variational inference. The method is studied by modeling on a large and heterogeneous dataset, consisting of 60 wells across five different oil and gas assets. The predictive performance is analyzed on historical and future test data, where an average error of 4-6% and 8-13% is achieved for the 50% best performing models, respectively. Variational inference appears to provide more robust predictions than the reference approach on future data. Prediction performance and uncertainty calibration is explored in detail and discussed in light of four data challenges. The findings motivate the development of alternative strategies to improve the robustness of data-driven VFMs.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2021.
Builds on
12 of 60 references.
References · 12
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 4,053
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
- 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,472
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
- 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
- 2015Variational Dropout and the Local Reparameterization Trickcited by 490
- 2017Deep Learning: A Bayesian Perspectivecited by 20
- 2020Developing a Hybrid Data-Driven, Mechanistic Virtual Flow Meter -- a Case Studycited by 6
- 2014Toward an enhanced Bayesian estimation framework for multiphase flow soft-sensingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
5 papers.
- 2021Multi-task learning for virtual flow meteringcited by 6
- 2021On gray-box modeling for virtual flow meteringcited by 4
- 2022Passive learning to address nonstationarity in virtual flow metering applicationscited by 3
- 2021When is gray-box modeling advantageous for virtual flow metering?cited by 1
- 2023Multi-task and few-shot learning in virtual flow meteringcited by 1
- 2023Multi-task and few-shot learning in virtual flow metering27 Sep 2023
- 2022Passive learning to address nonstationarity in virtual flow metering applications7 Feb 2022
- 2021When is gray-box modeling advantageous for virtual flow metering?11 Oct 2021
- 2021On gray-box modeling for virtual flow metering23 Mar 2021
- 2021Multi-task learning for virtual flow metering15 Mar 2021