When is gray-box modeling advantageous for virtual flow metering?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Integration of physics and machine learning in virtual flow metering applications is known as gray-box modeling. The combination is believed to enhance multiphase flow rate predictions. However, the superiority of gray-box models is yet to be demonstrated in the literature. This article examines scenarios where a gray-box model is expected to outperform physics-based and data-driven models. The experiments are conducted with synthetic data where properties of the underlying data generating process are known and controlled. The results show that a gray-box model yields increased prediction accuracy over a physics-based model in the presence of process-model mismatch. They also show improvements over a data-driven model when the amount of available data is small. On the other hand, gray-box and data-driven models are similarly influenced by noisy measurements. Lastly, the results indicate that a gray-box approach may be advantageous in nonstationary process conditions. Unfortunately, choosing the best model prior to training is challenging, and overhead on model development is unavoidable.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2021.
Builds on
6 of 26 references.
References · 6
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019Explainable Machine Learning for Scientific Insights and Discoveriescited by 166
- 2020Developing a Hybrid Data-Driven, Mechanistic Virtual Flow Meter -- a Case Studycited by 6
- 2021Bayesian Neural Networks for Virtual Flow Metering: An Empirical Studycited by 5
- 2021On gray-box modeling for virtual flow meteringcited by 4
- 2020Identifiability and physical interpretability of hybrid, gray-box models -- a case studycited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.