mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adversarial Stylometry in the Wild: Transferable Lexical Substitution Attacks on Author Profiling

arXiv 2101.11310 ↗First posted 27 Jan 2021cs.CL cs.CYcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Written language contains stylistic cues that can be exploited to automatically infer a variety of potentially sensitive author information. Adversarial stylometry intends to attack such models by rewriting an author's text. Our research proposes several components to facilitate deployment of these adversarial attacks in the wild, where neither data nor target models are accessible. We introduce a transformer-based extension of a lexical replacement attack, and show it achieves high transferability when trained on a weakly labeled corpus -- decreasing target model performance below chance. While not completely inconspicuous, our more successful attacks also prove notably less detectable by humans. Our framework therefore provides a promising direction for future privacy-preserving adversarial attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2021.

Builds on

29 of 84 references.

References · 29

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  5. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  6. 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 709
  7. 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 663
  8. 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 439
  9. 2017Synthetic and Natural Noise Both Break Neural Machine Translationcited by 304
  10. 2018Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviorcited by 265
  11. 2017Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLGcited by 232
  12. 2015Censoring Representations with an Adversarycited by 191
17 more
  1. 2014SimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models with (Genuine) Similarity Estimationcited by 170
  2. 2016Counter-fitting Word Vectors to Linguistic Constraintscited by 138
  3. 2017Deep Text Classification Can be Fooledcited by 105
  4. 2019Text Processing Like Humans Do: Visually Attacking and Shielding NLP Systemscited by 99
  5. 2018Seq2Sick: Evaluating the Robustness of Sequence-to-Sequence Models with Adversarial Examplescited by 93
  6. 2018On Adversarial Examples for Character-Level Neural Machine Translationcited by 85
  7. 2018Towards Robust and Privacy-preserving Text Representationscited by 75
  8. 2018Generalised Differential Privacy for Text Document Processingcited by 52
  9. 2020Multilingual Twitter Corpus and Baselines for Evaluating Demographic Bias in Hate Speech Recognitioncited by 43
  10. 2017A4NT: Author Attribute Anonymity by Adversarial Training of Neural Machine Translationcited by 41
  11. 2016Representation of linguistic form and function in recurrent neural networkscited by 39
  12. 2019ER-AE: Differentially Private Text Generation for Authorship Anonymizationcited by 35
  13. 2017The Case for Being Average: A Mediocrity Approach to Style Masking and Author Obfuscationcited by 15
  14. 2015When Coding Style Survives Compilation: De-anonymizing Programmers from Executable Binariescited by 11
  15. 2018Style Obfuscation by Invariancecited by 10
  16. 2020A Girl Has A Name: Detecting Authorship Obfuscationcited by 7
  17. 2019ALTER: Auxiliary Text Rewriting Tool for Natural Language Generationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

12 papers.