mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improving prediction of the terrestrial water storage anomalies during the GRACE and GRACE-FO gap with Bayesian convolutional neural networks

arXiv 2101.09361 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2021physics.ao-ph cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite and its successor GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO) provide valuable and accurate observations of terrestrial water storage anomalies (TWSAs) at a global scale. However, there is an approximately one-year observation gap of TWSAs between GRACE and GRACE-FO. This poses a challenge for practical applications, as discontinuity in the TWSA observations may introduce significant biases and uncertainties in the hydrological model predictions and consequently mislead decision making. To tackle this challenge, a Bayesian convolutional neural network (BCNN) driven by climatic data is proposed in this study to bridge this gap at a global scale. Enhanced by integrating recent advances in deep learning, including the attention mechanisms and the residual and dense connections, BCNN can automatically and efficiently extract important features for TWSA predictions from multi-source input data. The predicted TWSAs are compared to the hydrological model outputs and three recent TWSA prediction products. The comparison suggests the superior performance of BCNN in providing improved predictions of TWSAs during the gap in particular in the relatively arid regions. The BCNN's ability to identify the extreme dry and wet events during the gap period is further discussed and comprehensively demonstrated by comparing with the precipitation anomalies, drought index, ground/surface water levels. Results indicate that BCNN is capable of offering a reliable solution to maintain the TWSA data continuity and quantify the impacts of climate extremes during the gap.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2021.

Builds on

12 of 70 references.

References · 12

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  5. 2018CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Modulecited by 2,477
  6. 2016Stein Variational Gradient Descent: A General Purpose Bayesian Inference Algorithmcited by 507
  7. 2015Recent Advances in Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 360
  8. 2018Bayesian Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Networks for Surrogate Modeling and Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 199
  9. 2018Deep convolutional encoder-decoder networks for uncertainty quantification of dynamic multiphase flow in heterogeneous mediacited by 56
  10. 2017A trans-disciplinary review of deep learning research for water resources scientistscited by 47
  11. 2018Deep autoregressive neural networks for high-dimensional inverse problems in groundwater contaminant source identificationcited by 26
  12. 2019Combining Physically-Based Modeling and Deep Learning for Fusing GRACE Satellite Data: Can We Learn from Mismatch?cited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.