Combining Physically-Based Modeling and Deep Learning for Fusing GRACE Satellite Data: Can We Learn from Mismatch?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Global hydrological and land surface models are increasingly used for tracking terrestrial total water storage (TWS) dynamics, but the utility of existing models is hampered by conceptual and/or data uncertainties related to various underrepresented and unrepresented processes, such as groundwater storage. The gravity recovery and climate experiment (GRACE) satellite mission provided a valuable independent data source for tracking TWS at regional and continental scales. Strong interests exist in fusing GRACE data into global hydrological models to improve their predictive performance. Here we develop and apply deep convolutional neural network (CNN) models to learn the spatiotemporal patterns of mismatch between TWS anomalies (TWSA) derived from GRACE and those simulated by NOAH, a widely used land surface model. Once trained, our CNN models can be used to correct the NOAH simulated TWSA without requiring GRACE data, potentially filling the data gap between GRACE and its follow-on mission, GRACE-FO. Our methodology is demonstrated over India, which has experienced significant groundwater depletion in recent decades that is nevertheless not being captured by the NOAH model. Results show that the CNN models significantly improve the match with GRACE TWSA, achieving a country-average correlation coefficient of 0.94 and Nash-Sutcliff efficient of 0.87, or 14% and 52% improvement respectively over the original NOAH TWSA. At the local scale, the learned mismatch pattern correlates well with the observed in situ groundwater storage anomaly data for most parts of India, suggesting that deep learning models effectively compensate for the missing groundwater component in NOAH for this study region.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2021Improving prediction of the terrestrial water storage anomalies during the GRACE and GRACE-FO gap with Bayesian convolutional neural networkscited by 2
- 2021Applications of physics-informed scientific machine learning in subsurface science: A surveycited by 2
- 2025IDRIFTNET: Physics-Driven Spatiotemporal Deep Learning for Iceberg Drift Forecastingcited by 0
- 2025Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for scaling: An application for deducing hydrologic connectivity at watershed scalecited by 0
- 2026Static and auto-regressive neural emulation of phytoplankton biomass dynamics from physical predictors in the global oceancited by 0
- 2026Static and auto-regressive neural emulation of phytoplankton biomass dynamics from physical predictors in the global ocean4 Feb 2026
- 2025Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for scaling: An application for deducing hydrologic connectivity at watershed scale2 Sep 2025
- 2025IDRIFTNET: Physics-Driven Spatiotemporal Deep Learning for Iceberg Drift Forecasting18 Jun 2025
- 2021Applications of physics-informed scientific machine learning in subsurface science: A survey10 Apr 2021
- 2021Improving prediction of the terrestrial water storage anomalies during the GRACE and GRACE-FO gap with Bayesian convolutional neural networks21 Jan 2021