Online Active Proposal Set Generation for Weakly Supervised Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To reduce the manpower consumption on box-level annotations, many weakly supervised object detection methods which only require image-level annotations, have been proposed recently. The training process in these methods is formulated into two steps. They firstly train a neural network under weak supervision to generate pseudo ground truths (PGTs). Then, these PGTs are used to train another network under full supervision. Compared with fully supervised methods, the training process in weakly supervised methods becomes more complex and time-consuming. Furthermore, overwhelming negative proposals are involved at the first step. This is neglected by most methods, which makes the training network biased towards to negative proposals and thus degrades the quality of the PGTs, limiting the training network performance at the second step. Online proposal sampling is an intuitive solution to these issues. However, lacking of adequate labeling, a simple online proposal sampling may make the training network stuck into local minima. To solve this problem, we propose an Online Active Proposal Set Generation (OPG) algorithm. Our OPG algorithm consists of two parts: Dynamic Proposal Constraint (DPC) and Proposal Partition (PP). DPC is proposed to dynamically determine different proposal sampling strategy according to the current training state. PP is used to score each proposal, part proposals into different sets and generate an active proposal set for the network optimization. Through experiments, our proposed OPG shows consistent and significant improvement on both datasets PASCAL VOC 2007 and 2012, yielding comparable performance to the state-of-the-art results.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2021.
Builds on
19 of 36 references.
References · 19
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,130
- 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,933
- 2016Training Region-based Object Detectors with Online Hard Example Miningcited by 579
- 2019Libra R-CNN: Towards Balanced Learning for Object Detectioncited by 255
- 2015Weakly Supervised Deep Detection Networkscited by 183
- 2017Multiple Instance Detection Network with Online Instance Classifier Refinementcited by 117
- 2018PCL: Proposal Cluster Learning for Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 97
7 more
- 2019C-MIL: Continuation Multiple Instance Learning for Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 71
- 2019WSOD^2: Learning Bottom-up and Top-down Objectness Distillation for Weakly-supervised Object Detectioncited by 51
- 2016ContextLocNet: Context-Aware Deep Network Models for Weakly Supervised Localizationcited by 39
- 2018Zigzag Learning for Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 24
- 2018TS2C: Tight Box Mining with Surrounding Segmentation Context for Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 22
- 2019Object-Aware Instance Labeling for Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 11
- 2018Collaborative Learning for Weakly Supervised Object Detectioncited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.