mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Creativity in translation: machine translation as a constraint for literary texts

arXiv 2204.05655 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2022cs.CL cs.HCcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This article presents the results of a study involving the translation of a short story by Kurt Vonnegut from English to Catalan and Dutch using three modalities: machine-translation (MT), post-editing (PE) and translation without aid (HT). Our aim is to explore creativity, understood to involve novelty and acceptability, from a quantitative perspective. The results show that HT has the highest creativity score, followed by PE, and lastly, MT, and this is unanimous from all reviewers. A neural MT system trained on literary data does not currently have the necessary capabilities for a creative translation; it renders literal solutions to translation problems. More importantly, using MT to post-edit raw output constrains the creativity of translators, resulting in a poorer translation often not fit for publication, according to experts.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2022.

Builds on

3 of 52 references.

References · 3

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2021The Impact of Post-editing and Machine Translation on Creativity and Reading Experiencecited by 10
  3. 2020Machine Translation of Novels in the Age of Transformercited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

10 papers.