Contrastive Learning Improves Critical Event Prediction in COVID-19 Patients
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine Learning (ML) models typically require large-scale, balanced training data to be robust, generalizable, and effective in the context of healthcare. This has been a major issue for developing ML models for the coronavirus-disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic where data is highly imbalanced, particularly within electronic health records (EHR) research. Conventional approaches in ML use cross-entropy loss (CEL) that often suffers from poor margin classification. For the first time, we show that contrastive loss (CL) improves the performance of CEL especially for imbalanced EHR data and the related COVID-19 analyses. This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. We use EHR data from five hospitals within the Mount Sinai Health System (MSHS) to predict mortality, intubation, and intensive care unit (ICU) transfer in hospitalized COVID-19 patients over 24 and 48 hour time windows. We train two sequential architectures (RNN and RETAIN) using two loss functions (CEL and CL). Models are tested on full sample data set which contain all available data and restricted data set to emulate higher class imbalance.CL models consistently outperform CEL models with the restricted data set on these tasks with differences ranging from 0.04 to 0.15 for AUPRC and 0.05 to 0.1 for AUROC. For the restricted sample, only the CL model maintains proper clustering and is able to identify important features, such as pulse oximetry. CL outperforms CEL in instances of severe class imbalance, on three EHR outcomes with respect to three performance metrics: predictive power, clustering, and feature importance. We believe that the developed CL framework can be expanded and used for EHR ML work in general.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2021.
Builds on
12 of 44 references.
References · 12
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
- 2019Heterogeneous Graph Attention Networkcited by 732
- 2020Contrastive Learning of Medical Visual Representations from Paired Images and Textcited by 636
- 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 488
- 2016RETAIN: An Interpretable Predictive Model for Healthcare using Reverse Time Attention Mechanismcited by 344
- 2015Doctor AI: Predicting Clinical Events via Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 205
- 2016GRAM: Graph-based Attention Model for Healthcare Representation Learningcited by 152
- 2017Deep EHR: A Survey of Recent Advances in Deep Learning Techniques for Electronic Health Record (EHR) Analysiscited by 145
- 2019Learning the Graphical Structure of Electronic Health Records with Graph Convolutional Transformercited by 88
- 2020Deep Representation Learning of Electronic Health Records to Unlock Patient Stratification at Scalecited by 39
- 2020Network Medicine Framework for Identifying Drug Repurposing Opportunities for COVID-19cited by 38
Built on by
Not cited yet.