mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Scaling Up Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification for Inverse Problems using Deep Neural Networks

arXiv 2101.03906 ↗First posted 11 Jan 2021stat.CO stat.MLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Due to the importance of uncertainty quantification (UQ), Bayesian approach to inverse problems has recently gained popularity in applied mathematics, physics, and engineering. However, traditional Bayesian inference methods based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) tend to be computationally intensive and inefficient for such high dimensional problems. To address this issue, several methods based on surrogate models have been proposed to speed up the inference process. More specifically, the calibration-emulation-sampling (CES) scheme has been proven to be successful in large dimensional UQ problems. In this work, we propose a novel CES approach for Bayesian inference based on deep neural network models for the emulation phase. The resulting algorithm is computationally more efficient and more robust against variations in the training set. Further, by using an autoencoder (AE) for dimension reduction, we have been able to speed up our Bayesian inference method up to three orders of magnitude. Overall, our method, henceforth called Dimension-Reduced Emulative Autoencoder Monte Carlo (DREAMC) algorithm, is able to scale Bayesian UQ up to thousands of dimensions for inverse problems. Using two low-dimensional (linear and nonlinear) inverse problems we illustrate the validity of this approach. Next, we apply our method to two high-dimensional numerical examples (elliptic and advection-diffussion) to demonstrate its computational advantages over existing algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 111 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2021.

Builds on

21 of 111 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 997
  2. 2014Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overviewcited by 765
  3. 2017Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processescited by 617
  4. 2016Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 431
  5. 2017The Expressive Power of Neural Networks: A View from the Widthcited by 318
  6. 2014Scalable Variational Gaussian Process Classificationcited by 226
  7. 2018Universality of Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 176
  8. 2016Approximation by Combinations of ReLU and Squared ReLU Ridge Functions with ℓ1 and ℓ0 Controlscited by 84
  9. 2017A Review of Convolutional Neural Networks for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 81
  10. 2018MeshCNN: A Network with an Edgecited by 69
  11. 2019Accelerated Information Gradient flowcited by 38
  12. 2014Dimension-independent likelihood-informed MCMCcited by 36
9 more
  1. 2018Ensemble Kalman Inversion: A Derivative-Free Technique For Machine Learning Taskscited by 36
  2. 2015Data Assimilation: A Mathematical Introductioncited by 26
  3. 2020Information Newton's flow: second-order optimization method in probability spacecited by 22
  4. 2019Deep Integro-Difference Equation Models for Spatio-Temporal Forecastingcited by 15
  5. 2015A regularizing iterative ensemble Kalman method for PDE-constrained inverse problemscited by 13
  6. 2019Tikhonov Regularization Within Ensemble Kalman Inversioncited by 13
  7. 2017Ensemble Kalman methods for high-dimensional hierarchical dynamic space-time modelscited by 10
  8. 2014A Stable Manifold MCMC Method for High Dimensionscited by 4
  9. 2018Multi-resolution filters for massive spatio-temporal datacited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

9 papers.